Re: [Dime] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dime-e2e-sec-req-02

Matt Holdrege <holdrege@gmail.com> Thu, 07 May 2015 08:52 UTC

Return-Path: <holdrege@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82471A1AA7 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2015 01:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N0iIsQdZYUHY for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 May 2015 01:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 516A11A88D8 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 May 2015 01:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so7451381igb.0 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 May 2015 01:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=afv9mTKJZBOkfgdoyKJgsNfIfwgAerckKQvOVhYI9tM=; b=aUD1lpIdeZRO+pGV3i7pMOnDOKlT88S7wJ3zLZq/j7c2DhZa3IRi9ix7iNuVMIlSu8 Z467aRSD+CMBmVNvYizfH+YMh5OPUzbFFbAgs2wW+kGA8e8D2/TlDPtmEWZaGE3A9/rl JP4aKUvpWuvvkdjsyi6B+qijKqOHFbdG5awmACiO8/BJ9/O8jxXTq7FR5itb9y4YBgo5 weQvFmRRinEsX3BbyCh6XB6jWg99Cqy5Por3uuOtdmGYBgnAANU7P6JgKIc5QvEVNxUQ +3LOuWYFVi3Eb7HRt6c89pgeS2GdBOMaPUEc5hpwTMD0J+Im3YMKjf3hHIA2GHvSvSCB PAIw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.77.13 with SMTP id o13mr13204080igw.39.1430988743939; Thu, 07 May 2015 01:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.24.69 with HTTP; Thu, 7 May 2015 01:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3095_1430986707_554B1FD3_3095_5616_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E0115B8B6@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <CAFtys5=Fr7U_2V7KX+W6Bw=2hoFbfQPOAs7T0LkzZhhcDtGHvQ@mail.gmail.com> <3095_1430986707_554B1FD3_3095_5616_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E0115B8B6@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 10:52:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFtys5=YZscDG9CG+4rOnD7cpcyK_fuDtCwKWx=3FBEm-TSdGA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Holdrege <holdrege@gmail.com>
To: lionel.morand@orange.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bdc110ac29c0305157a07af"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/TSItMc8Wv2PeGcY0GIQ4tc1fwxM>
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dime-e2e-sec-req-02
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 08:52:27 -0000

Lionel,

802.3 is not wireless nor an "air" interface. Maybe you meant 802.11? And
my point was that we are not just protecting air interfaces, but any IP
interface. But again, it's a tiny nit. Not a big deal.

-Matt

On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:18 AM, <lionel.morand@orange.com> wrote:

>  Hi Matt,
>
>
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
>
>
> About the minor comment, the current text is:
>
>
>
>       As an example, consider the Diameter EAP
>
>       application [4 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dime-e2e-sec-req-02#ref-4>] that allows keying material for the protection of
>
>       air interface
>
>
>
> and it refers to the use of Diameter EAP to perform EAP authentications
> (e.g. EAP-AKA) for the generation of cryptographic keys that  could be
> further used for protecting the wireless interface (e.g. 802.3).
>
> The text might be clarified but I think it is correct as it is. I will let
> Jouni see if any update is required on this part.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Lionel
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :* Matt Holdrege [mailto:holdrege@gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* mardi 7 avril 2015 11:51
> *À :* dime@ietf.org
> *Cc :* MORAND Lionel IMT/OLN
> *Objet :* Re: [Dime] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dime-e2e-sec-req-02
>
>
>
> I just gave it a fresh read and I see just one tiny nit. In section 3
> under Eavesdropping it mentions protecting the *air* interface. I don't
> recall in any of the DIME RFC's where we mention the physical media, right?
> Because of course the protocol runs over any type of media which carries
> IP.
>
>
>
> Not a big deal to me and if the authors want to leave it in, I'll trust
> them to it and give my approval to the document.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> -Matt Holdrege
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>