Re: [Dime] OVLI: comments to 4.1

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 16 December 2013 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBD01ADD02 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:10:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3L4bYxwrAv0L for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E973E1AC862 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:10:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.10.7] (mobile-166-147-068-041.mycingular.net [166.147.68.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rBGLAGmj095870 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:10:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151A5D34@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:10:39 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9FE7A52E-2087-4058-B8C1-E577605F8BC1@nostrum.com>
References: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519DA3E@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <09616DA2-D1ED-40EE-8E89-755DFCD81092@gmail.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519E02B@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <1A402C59-E390-4C95-8E30-97F1F9D3EF0F@gmail.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519E05C@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <790F1603-64D5-40E2-BC59-FD4C104EEF1B@gmail.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519E0D9@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <C1AC0D6D-EDA2-41E2-8FB9-CB82D2D409DA@gmail.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519E331@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <D1780C1C-D939-466E-8B04-3663F8888B23@gmail.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519E3C4@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <0CDBF4BB-4E38-41D6-A5E2-9218FFEFEA43@gmail.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519E6EF@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <52A869AD.6080305@usdonovans.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519E89B@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <52A9C040.40206@usdonovans.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519E9BE@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <52A9! D74B.8070404@usdonovans.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519E9FE@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <36AA0D1A-C1A8-4C3D-B47A-67606862E3F6@gmail.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151A5D34@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
To: "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 166.147.68.41 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] OVLI: comments to 4.1
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:10:44 -0000

On Dec 16, 2013, at 4:22 AM, Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich) <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>; wrote:

> Then let's do the same way with Ongoing-Throttling-Information.
> 

-1 (see my comment to earlier email.)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nospam@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 2:33 PM
> To: Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
> Cc: ext Steve Donovan; dime@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Dime] OVLI: comments to 4.1
> 
> 
> On Dec 12, 2013, at 6:02 PM, "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>; wrote:
> 
>> Steve,
>> ok, but then its only fair to let individual implementers (of reacting nodes) make the decision whether or not to spend the effort of include a sequence number in the OC-Supported-Features (i.e. make the sequence number optional). 
> 
> Having a mandatory to send but optional to process AVP would fit here.
> That would not be optional in a Diameter CCF point of view but text
> saying on the receiver side "MAY process seqno.." or "SHOULD process
> seqno..". Just avoiding MUST should do.
> 
> - JOuni
>