[Dime] draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-26 Result-Code values

[Sebastien Decugis <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

I just compared the Result-Code values described in rfc3588bis-26
section 7.1.x with existing IANA registry, and found several
differences, which are currently not reflected in the IANA
Considerations section -- I believe someone is already working on this
section (although I lost track of whom) so I thought I would write down
the differences I found to help in this work -- I hope this is not
redundant.

DIAMETER_COMMAND_UNSUPPORTED:
- value 3001 in IANA registry,
- value 5019 in 3588bis.

DIAMETER_INVALID_HDR_BITS:
- value 3008 in IANA,
- value 5020 in 3588bis
- also,

DIAMETER_INVALID_AVP_BITS:
- value 3009 in IANA,
- value 5021 in rfc3588bis

DIAMETER_UNKNOWN_PEER:
- value 3010 in IANA,
- value 5018 in rfc3588bis (conflicts with IANA)

DIAMETER_INVALID_BIT_IN_HEADER:
- 5013 in IANA,
- 3011 in rfc3588bis
- seems redundant with DIAMETER_INVALID_HDR_BITS.

DIAMETER_INVALID_MESSAGE_LENGTH:
- value 5015 in IANA,
- value 3012 in rfc3588bis

DIAMETER_INVALID_AVP_BIT_COMBO:
- value 5016 in IANA
- not defined in rfc3588bis
- is it deprecated? it seems redundant with DIAMETER_INVALID_AVP_BITS
anyway...

Hope this helps,
Sebastien.

-- 
Sebastien Decugis
Research fellow
Network Architecture Group
NICT (nict.go.jp)