Re: [Dime] Quick review of draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana-00.txt
Sebastien Decugis <sdecugis@nict.go.jp> Wed, 17 June 2009 08:45 UTC
Return-Path: <sdecugis@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5C628C179 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.447, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pW-xkYLPjtQH for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.nict.go.jp (ns1.nict.go.jp [IPv6:2001:2f8:29::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5478F28C0E2 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:45:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw1.nict.go.jp (gw1 [133.243.18.250]) by ns1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id n5H8jjuH020832 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:45:45 +0900 (JST)
Received: from gw1.nict.go.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id n5H8jjax014198 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:45:45 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail3.nict.go.jp (mail.nict.go.jp [133.243.18.3]) by gw1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id n5H8jjO0014192 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:45:45 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail3.nict.go.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail) with ESMTP id B6B9215FB2 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:45:45 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [133.243.146.166] (5gou2f-dhcp06.nict.go.jp [133.243.146.166]) by mail3.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail) with ESMTP id B15A815FB1 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:45:45 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <4A38AD20.4020606@nict.go.jp>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:45:20 +0900
From: Sebastien Decugis <sdecugis@nict.go.jp>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
References: <1F18D6510CF0474A8C9500565A7E41A20545674479@NOK-EUMSG-02.mgdnok.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <1F18D6510CF0474A8C9500565A7E41A20545674479@NOK-EUMSG-02.mgdnok.nokia.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
OpenPGP: id=33D9F61D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Dime] Quick review of draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:45:38 -0000
Hello,
I'd just have a very small editorial comment. By the end of page 4:
WG [I-D.ietf-dime-rfc3588bis]. and when approved will obsolete RFC
^^^
I think the dot after the reference should be removed.
Since the content is redundant with rfc3588bis section 11.2.1, I am
wondering if modifying that draft (3588bis) to reference this one when
it becomes an RFC (hopefully before the 3588bis) would not result in
less work for everyone ? Just an idea...
Best regards,
Sebastien.
--
Sebastien Decugis
Research fellow
Network Architecture Group
NICT (nict.go.jp)
- Re: [Dime] Quick review of draft-ietf-dime-diamet… Sebastien Decugis
- Re: [Dime] Quick review of draft-ietf-dime-diamet… Qin Wu
- [Dime] Quick review of draft-ietf-dime-diameter-c… john.loughney