Re: [Dime] Review of draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana
"Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 12 July 2009 08:18 UTC
Return-Path: <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003253A6A25 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.872
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.872 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.873, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TVPzbdReN9gW for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 949B53A683D for <dime@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2009 08:18:30 -0000
Received: from a91-154-108-144.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO 4FIL42860) [91.154.108.144] by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 12 Jul 2009 10:18:30 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18sUdRkrdgsXQ7hkV2bxLonGWH/Wbjb8LyKMDmP+p ethLztmR97XKoP
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
To: 'Mark Jones' <Mark.Jones@bridgewatersystems.com>, dime@ietf.org
References: <4E0F60BAF2FA7C46BBB5474DF8A89BCD022F034C95@m679t05.fpmis.bridgewatersys.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 11:20:48 +0300
Message-ID: <186801ca02c9$aa058150$501ca20a@nsnintra.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <4E0F60BAF2FA7C46BBB5474DF8A89BCD022F034C95@m679t05.fpmis.bridgewatersys.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: Acn4zMguFnarNKd4QT6lWGKyxVbNXQJ+baWw
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.5600000000000001
Subject: Re: [Dime] Review of draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:18:04 -0000
Hi Mark, Thanks for the review. >-----Original Message----- >From: dime-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On >Behalf Of Mark Jones >Sent: 29 June, 2009 18:18 >To: dime@ietf.org >Subject: [Dime] Review of draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana > >I realize that this is past the review deadline but hope it is >not too late for consideration. My comments on the Abstract >and Introduction are editorial but the meat of it (the IANA >considerations) looks fine to me. > >Abstract: >--- >Suggest rewording: > RFC 3588 illustrates the conditions that > lead to the need to define a new Diameter application or a new > command code. >To: > RFC3588 illustrates the conditions which require the definition of > a new Diameter application or a new ommand. Fixed. >--- >Suggest rewording: > This document aligns the extensibility rules of Diameter application > with the Diameter commands offering ways to >To: > This document aligns the extensibility rules for Diameter >command codes > with those defined for Diameter application identifiers and offers a > consistent way to Fixed. >=== > >1. Introduction > >Suggest rewording: > This is achieved by splitting the command code space into an IANA > administered code space, and a vendors-specific code space with > different rules of allocation as per [RFC5226]. >To: > This is achieved by splitting the command code space into an IETF > code space, and a vendors-specific code space with different rules > of allocation as per [RFC5226]. > Fixed. >The whole command code space is still under IANA administration, right? Yes. I changed the wording to make it more clear. > >--- > >Typo: > s/[I-D.ietf-dime-rfc3588bis]./[I-D.ietf-dime-rfc3588bis] Update here: http://www.tschofenig.priv.at/svn/draft-romascanu-diameter-cmd-iana/draft-ie tf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana-01.txt Ciao Hannes > >--- > >Regards >Mark >_______________________________________________ >DiME mailing list >DiME@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime >
- [Dime] Review of draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana Mark Jones
- Re: [Dime] Review of draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd… Hannes Tschofenig