Re: [Dime] Rechartering: draft-korhonen-dime-pmip6

Hannes,

I think it would be more constructive to not send a "form" letter on  
all of these drafts, but rather sit down and bring up specific  
points.  As an example, in your second question below, you ask who is  
willing to co-author the draft?  Well, this particular draft has 5 co- 
authors already.  Are you seriously asking for more? If anything, it  
would be nice to see the extent by which co-authors can be trimmed  
with the hopes that others will speak up from an outside perspective.   
(and please note, I have absolutely nothing against the current author  
list of the korhonen draft!!!...I'm just speaking in general terms)

cheers,

-ken

On Jul 15, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:

> Document: http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-korhonen-dime-pmip6-03.txt
>
> * Who is able to be editor of the document?
>
> * Who is interested to help the editor with the work on the draft by  
> co-authoring it?
>
> * Who is able to provide reviews?
>
> * Who is unable to actively help but supports it?
>
> * Are there concerns regarding this document?
>
> * Is there a dependency with another IETF working group or with  
> another SDO?
>
> * How long will it take to finish this document?
> (A rough guess based on the current status of the document. By  
> "finished" I mean "ready for WGLC".)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime