[Dime] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-10
Susan Hares <email@example.com> Mon, 21 January 2019 21:03 UTC
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C9B1288BD; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:03:01 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From: Susan Hares <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:03:01 -0800
Subject: [Dime] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-10
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:03:02 -0000
Reviewer: Susan Hares Review result: Ready Steve and Eric: I have reveiwed this document as part of the operational directorate (ops-dir) ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being process by the IESG for operational aspects. These comments are to aid the authors and the NM/OPS Area Directors. The document editors and the WG chairs hsould treat these comments as any other last call comments. Status: ready, with 2 operator questions and 1 yang question. The question are just things to think about for the authors and ADS. Questions: The documentis readable and aligns with RFC7683 and draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload. The language in this document also aligns with language in the SIP Overload Control (SOC) document [RFC7415]. As I am not familar with current DIAMETER deployments, i've got a few operational questions for the authors to consider: 1) If a operator where deploying this new algorithm, what type of deployment considerations would be necessary? Should certain topologies of Diameter deployments utilize certain overload algorithms? 2) What failure modes will the operator see in the current overload abatement that would encourage the operator to spend the effort to go to this new DOIC rate limit? As a researcher and implementer, sections 1 and 7 were sufficient to answer these questions. However, I would ask the authors, WG chairs, and OPS/NM ADs to determine if these are sufficient for the normal operators. Question 3: Just for my own understanding, is there a plan to control DIAMETER protocols with YANG modules?
- [Dime] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dime… Susan Hares
- Re: [Dime] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Steve Donovan