IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] DOIC Issue Status

"Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com> Wed, 26 February 2014 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5A51A02EE for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 04:35:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NwFkTBcLLtno for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 04:35:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B776D1A02EB for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 04:35:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1QCZTkZ030580 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:35:29 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.32]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s1QCZTQw020860 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:35:29 +0100
Received: from DEMUHTC005.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.36) by DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:35:28 +0100
Received: from DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.14.242]) by DEMUHTC005.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:35:28 +0100
From: "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
To: ext Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>, "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] DOIC Issue Status
Thread-Index: AQHPMgRvZ4sdKrf8W0iuf9I4MThX8prHeUBQ
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:35:28 +0000
Message-ID: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B49D8@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
References: <530C100E.4070607@usdonovans.com>
In-Reply-To: <530C100E.4070607@usdonovans.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.116]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B49D8DEMUMBX014nsnin_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 32621
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1393418129-00005322-C663CC3B/0-0/0-0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/qL5Fg0E9sluSN7QgOfc3u3LVgtM
Subject: Re: [Dime] DOIC Issue Status
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 12:35:37 -0000

Steve,

please find some proposed updates attached.

Ulrich

From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Steve Donovan
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 4:38 AM
To: dime@ietf.org
Subject: [Dime] DOIC Issue Status

All,

My apologies for the flood of messages to the DIME list today.  I was in the process of compiling the attached document.

The document attempts to capture the status of all of the open trouble tickets for the DIOC specification.  It is the first draft so be nice if there are obvious errors.

I am compiling this in advance of next weeks DIME working group meeting in London.  I hope to have resolved issues updated in a preliminary version of a -02 version of the DOIC draft prior to the DIME meeting.

Please let me know if there is disagreement on the items I have marked as resolved, as I will be making those updates to the DOIC draft first.

It is also possible that some of those I have marked as open can be moved pretty quickly to resolved.

Regards,

Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email