Re: [Dime] What is the difference between Ro and Gy interface of diameter?

Ivan Skytte Jørgensen <isj-dime@i1.dk> Sat, 04 May 2013 11:58 UTC

Return-Path: <isj-dime@i1.dk>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B459821F949D for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 May 2013 04:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.233
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, HELO_EQ_DK=1.009, HELO_MISMATCH_DK=1.7, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qa1xzq+vqbHj for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 May 2013 04:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i1.dk (188-176-48-94-static.dk.customer.tdc.net [188.176.48.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9588E21F93AA for <dime@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 May 2013 04:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i1.dk (isjsys5 [127.0.0.1]) by i1.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4672E5C009C for <dime@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 May 2013 13:58:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from isjsys.int.i1.dk (isjsys-i0.int.i1.dk [IPv6:2001:16d8:dd31:1:219:d1ff:fe90:2bfa]) by i1.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP for <dime@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 May 2013 13:58:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from isjsys.localnet (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by isjsys.int.i1.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C295E9FA6 for <dime@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 May 2013 13:58:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ivan Skytte Jørgensen <isj-dime@i1.dk>
To: dime@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 13:58:06 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.37.6-0.11-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; )
References: <abcd1234abc123ab12a0000000322000010000005101@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <abcd1234abc123ab12a0000000322000010000005101@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <201305041358.06833.isj-dime@i1.dk>
Subject: Re: [Dime] What is the difference between Ro and Gy interface of diameter?
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 11:58:22 -0000

On Lørdag den 4. maj 2013 09:26:04 Kevin Peterson wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> As per my understanding both are same but could not confirm the same from internet so asking this question.

Gy is mostly a restricted subset of Ro. For instance, in Gy online charging the use of multiple-services-credit-control AVP is mandatory.
Gy also adds some AVPs that Ro doesn't specify (eg. volume-quota-threshold).

/isj