[Dime] [dime] rfc4005bis #16 (new): Accounting-Request (ACR) Command
"dime issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org> Sat, 15 January 2011 20:55 UTC
Return-Path: <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E908D3A6E3A for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:55:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.586
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Waddu5gfeJXj for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3013A6D82 for <dime@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <trac@tools.ietf.org>) id 1PeDBd-0005Ar-Nw; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:57:25 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: dime issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.7
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.7, by Edgewall Software
To: dime@ietf.org, jouni.nospam@gmail.com
X-Trac-Project: dime
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 20:57:25 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/16
Message-ID: <064.0512efebff43593dc4038989266f0cc0@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 16
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: dime@ietf.org, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, dime-chairs@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: dime-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Dime] [dime] rfc4005bis #16 (new): Accounting-Request (ACR) Command
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Reply-To: dime@ietf.org
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 20:55:04 -0000
#16: Accounting-Request (ACR) Command
Section 3.9. Accounting-Request (ACR) Command
"Either the Acct-Application-Id AVP or the Vendor-Specific-
Application-Id AVP MUST be present."
Mark Jones> I understand that the Acct-Application-Id is required for
backwards compatibility (it is still redundant since the same app id
is in the command header) but don't see why
Vendor-Specific-Application-Id would ever need be present. The same
comment applies to Section 3.10.
--
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: jouni.nospam@… | Owner: dime@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: rfc4005bis | Version:
Severity: In WG Last Call | Keywords:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/trac/ticket/16>
dime <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dime/>
- [Dime] [dime] rfc4005bis #16 (new): Accounting-Re… dime issue tracker