[Din] How Consolidation is Eroding Internet Resilience
Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu> Mon, 24 November 2025 15:44 UTC
Return-Path: <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
X-Original-To: din@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: din@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C548F92AA5 for <din@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:44:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cs.ucla.edu
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id brhOA9xVzRto for <din@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:44:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu (mail.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB5FD8F92A8B for <din@irtf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:44:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405B83C0149EE for <din@irtf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:44:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10032) with ESMTP id wNkirVqdMJDB for <din@irtf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:44:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18FB43C0149F0 for <din@irtf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:44:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.cs.ucla.edu 18FB43C0149F0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.ucla.edu; s=9D0B346E-2AEB-11ED-9476-E14B719DCE6C; t=1763999054; bh=fVFfA1GddG0PgxYfid+ZR/UsJ/+ToXJ05bPc15QQHzM=; h=From:Mime-Version:Message-Id:Date:To; b=URI23gxfT/N9iJzeqiQQy+p5WSm3sZ28pmW73cJNCtMtP7tIspN4tLZy5b82u+RV1 wc2CfFJQbEWiGPbT6P8kFjds8/QuaeEPLAG3q6YwpJ0OY0RqdVTqhrdb56BFavJhTR ZwWNtn23aUktuCwgEUOnFSUS/XyqcQRvl7sY0+lr0U1doDRvG6yn65/sCzAmJoqdpY OGoGbIndON7BWaFxJeAUien7s50f7naxcgQWuYdBIF6jjNXCA89VGLBAk0OAr0FmnH nOWDMmGg9JuYZdx1PB85VyRkJQwREn+sdzuUFgQE2PQYWt1Nf2QAF1BGkO38Fx+rV+ ieTw/Zr8UYX3g==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavis at mail.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from mail.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP id g60k9gIf5VoB for <din@irtf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:44:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [169.232.72.103]) by mail.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0247A3C0149EB for <din@irtf.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:44:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.700.81\))
Message-Id: <D1904FB2-47CD-47A2-93E7-7937D58D8EF5@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:44:03 -0800
To: "din@irtf.org" <din@irtf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.700.81)
Message-ID-Hash: 7O4IXSE5SKFC7M7QPKW5PU4XDUTNZBZL
X-Message-ID-Hash: 7O4IXSE5SKFC7M7QPKW5PU4XDUTNZBZL
X-MailFrom: lixia@cs.ucla.edu
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-din.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Din] How Consolidation is Eroding Internet Resilience
List-Id: "Discussion of distributed Internet Infrastructure approaches, aspects such as Service Federation, and underlying technologies" <din.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/din/AOKVaaWteBT_7tm82XOoMN6IaWs>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/din>
List-Help: <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:din-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:din@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:din-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:din-leave@irtf.org>
Forwarding a relevant link originally posted to the nanog mailing list: https://pulse.internetsociety.org/blog/how-consolidation-is-eroding-internet-resilience Some may find this of interest. Regards, Hank _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/nanog@lists.nanog.org/message/5BZSAH5Y2YBSQFO4VV2XYNU7GXN2A5EW/
- [Din] How Consolidation is Eroding Internet Resil… Lixia Zhang
- [Din] Re: How Consolidation is Eroding Internet R… Jon Crowcroft