[Din] Quorum slice representation in revised SCP draft draft-mazieres-dinrg-scp-02

Piers Powlesland <pierspowlesland@gmail.com> Tue, 12 June 2018 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <pierspowlesland@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: din@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: din@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B8C130F73 for <din@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQFsGNdptkOM for <din@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9180A130F6A for <din@irtf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id j15-v6so418990wme.0 for <din@irtf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=o9u0oTLjfQyv0n0HUbhNFuh/hiLFtA0WEpuogDr/Srs=; b=l7aByIHWUB/EUsnHP+vU0EptGdTSTDZRZOfupQvaR4CHLr4EauYOizdGED4xpRQl0u 01+g591ypitFR37B8tv513dGqYXa599cOBNiXTho5cAzqm2ZneKr1GfQghZ7zSd7V+6T YzF9X8DkZLufDx5Qk618q01cYPyjTAKiA2bhhcyEOGmrGZGiTV41XZ/MD/EcvZDC4dr1 wbVjpV2SCUWeThXcMEoLx3F0er9lCYyLRR6CPsPhhrvq/ioB0aZJthjPMt+UcYG3hkhy dpgKQYoqgtRq7KH8hf9WFeeRh39X60YDqbjlmaq/iSmNwL7tbMqR+jvdiMOiHya7VitO ZsLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=o9u0oTLjfQyv0n0HUbhNFuh/hiLFtA0WEpuogDr/Srs=; b=TLZ/7UtoCzkw6JwDPGNUx82gi21YoXfEiJrQAuqvBqxddx9LFsKPnkK11+4n+0tEmV SZBPeezVpR/dXy0vleqildZFi5NtPXQhnh3q1Lh8pkLTJMI+o9J3qKdwR86dgKgg7pbr bIHzGbfDCZ26loQ30MbqdkTumLIBJWK03ijGPyXIatnvMYqY89qziX4hncrnuS9UDCGk Em67J/ufAhSUkPfmfyiIyJ7ty/Qtev137jChKgRVkcdt19hYsMlxxiFPhtrFJLza/1+b MkRhmiKWksFi81IXtz4lJQ+cfPgfZqloWM+Q3jXzceUO7ncFcG6Ch70r19mLJVGtH56o MqOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1FwaAayVQKQJJK5fz3oEpzxKsWVwyZp42y8O5YhrmSJmsTDzgC 3aCwCgzWhR4dD2sizt/usAjbUNkaegc9fbeCtXVuZg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKI0d8AiUvLSC3XgcVoEVIHXIo8Io2tAknxp3poVauhsod3HKX59x29eM53cr/6h2ss7Jy/Vr1deoL+F2Br1a7c=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9:: with SMTP id 9-v6mr846988wma.10.1528823584792; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:adf:eec9:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 10:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Piers Powlesland <pierspowlesland@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 18:13:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFXacX=QsPgu=jcgUtAJbQRnBZA_CmbY+AvjoovCoWuuVPqESQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: din@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b22439056e74fa88"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/din/HkRggUnnUzywV17fDYj0RGGzJe0>
Subject: [Din] Quorum slice representation in revised SCP draft draft-mazieres-dinrg-scp-02
X-BeenThere: din@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of distributed Internet Infrastructure approaches, aspects such as Service Federation, and underlying technologies" <din.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/din>, <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/din/>
List-Post: <mailto:din@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/din>, <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:27:44 -0000

Hi all,


The description of a node's quorum slices in the white paper is a
collection of sets of nodes for which any set is sufficient to convince the
node of system wide agreement. I would represent this as a list of lists.

So I'm wondering why the recursive SCPQuorumSet struct was chosen to
represent quorum slices?

Thanks,

Piers