Re: [Din] Draft IETF-101 DINRG meeting minutes
David Mazieres <dm-list-ietf-ilc@scs.stanford.edu> Sun, 25 March 2018 17:23 UTC
Return-Path: <dm-list-ietf-ilc@scs.stanford.edu>
X-Original-To: din@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: din@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37144127136 for <din@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 10:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E3Yx8EAEFCJ8 for <din@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 10:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (www.scs.stanford.edu [IPv6:2001:470:806d:1::9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9CDE126DFB for <din@irtf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 10:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w2PHNhJX092106; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 10:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from dm@localhost) by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w2PHNhfl055395; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 10:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Mazieres <dm-list-ietf-ilc@scs.stanford.edu>
To: Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net>, din@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <BDF91284-3DCA-4397-AF51-125ED358822F@dkutscher.net>
References: <BDF91284-3DCA-4397-AF51-125ED358822F@dkutscher.net>
Reply-To: David Mazieres expires 2018-06-23 PDT <mazieres-wmwk2nqdr5vsxiykp4zwa24846@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 10:23:43 -0700
Message-ID: <87efk8t6g0.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/din/L3erpjxwfrtg2g1xUcFnDvfOvTU>
Subject: Re: [Din] Draft IETF-101 DINRG meeting minutes
X-BeenThere: din@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of distributed Internet Infrastructure approaches, aspects such as Service Federation, and underlying technologies" <din.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/din>, <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/din/>
List-Post: <mailto:din@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/din>, <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 17:23:50 -0000
Dirk Kutscher <ietf@dkutscher.net> writes: > Hi, > > We have posted the draft minutes from last week’s meeting: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/minutes-101-dinrg-00.html > > Thanks a lot to our note takers Chris and Jordi Paillissé! > > Everyone, please let us know if you have additions or corrections. For Chainspace, my comment: David: Can amortize cost over arbitrarily many transactions, which has latency, but still low throughput. You could batch transactions to increase throughput. I think maybe I said "but high throughput," not low? I don't remember my exact words, but the point I intended to make is that the consensus algorithm should not impact throughput at all, only latency, since you can amortize a single round of consensus over an arbitrary number of transactions. David
- [Din] Draft IETF-101 DINRG meeting minutes Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [Din] Draft IETF-101 DINRG meeting minutes David Mazieres
- Re: [Din] Draft IETF-101 DINRG meeting minutes Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [Din] Draft IETF-101 DINRG meeting minutes Dirk Kutscher