javascript URI scheme not registered - spec seems to be missing

Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> Mon, 04 September 2006 16:22 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKHDm-0006M3-RC; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:22:50 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKHDk-0006Lx-UX for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:22:48 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GKHDf-0004tY-HK for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:22:48 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mail.songbird.com [208.184.79.10]) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k84GMomw013575 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:22:50 -0700
Message-ID: <44FC52C3.2060101@ninebynine.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:22:27 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: discuss@apps.ietf.org
Subject: javascript URI scheme not registered - spec seems to be missing
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Clean
X-Songbird-From: gk@ninebynine.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Digging around a question recently posed to me reveals that the commonly-used
(pseudo-)URI scheme 'javascript:' is not registered [1], and I also note that
the specification [3] noted by one web site [2] is no longer available.

BTW, the web page [4] ("What schemes are out there?") might be a useful resource
in considering what schemes might be candidates for provisional registration
(possibly with health warnings) if they're not already registered.

#g
--

[1] http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html

[2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes/javascript

[3] http://developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/js/client/jsref/index.htm (no
longer available)

[4] http://esw.w3.org/topic/UriSchemes


-- 
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact