Re: draft-klensin-net-utf8-07

Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM> Fri, 25 January 2008 00:37 UTC

Return-path: <discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JICZW-000138-0j; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:37:30 -0500
Received: from discuss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JICZU-0000wT-V8 for discuss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:37:28 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JICZU-0000tI-IJ for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:37:28 -0500
Received: from brmea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.98.31]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JICZS-0005mL-Gu for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:37:28 -0500
Received: from fe-amer-09.sun.com ([192.18.109.79]) by brmea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.6+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m0P0bPI5027715 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:37:26 GMT
Received: from conversion-daemon.mail-amer.sun.com by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) id <0JV600M01C8JRM00@mail-amer.sun.com> (original mail from Chris.Newman@Sun.COM) for discuss@apps.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:37:25 -0700 (MST)
Received: from nifty-silver.stc.com ([129.150.18.42]) by mail-amer.sun.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0JV6007I6CE728A0@mail-amer.sun.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:37:22 -0700 (MST)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:37:25 -0800
From: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: draft-klensin-net-utf8-07
In-reply-to: <200801101801.TAA09710@TR-Sys.de>
To: Alfred H?nes <ah@tr-sys.de>, john-ietf@jck.com, the.map@alum.mit.edu
Message-id: <E2B95BF85DE3169831ABD2BB@446E7922C82D299DB29D899F>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
References: <200801101801.TAA09710@TR-Sys.de>
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: discuss@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: general discussion of application-layer protocols <discuss.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:discuss@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>, <mailto:discuss-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: discuss-bounces@apps.ietf.org

Alfred H?nes wrote on 1/10/08 19:01 +0100:
> RFC 1641, (RFC 1642 -->) RFC 2152,
> and perhaps other early IETF I18N documents as well?
>
> In particular, the registrations for legacy representations of
> Unicode should be marked "deprecated" in the IANA charset registry;
> to this end, a substantive IANA Considerations section needs to be
> added to the draft.

I think these would distract from the primary focus of net-utf8.  However, they 
are good proposals and if you wrote them up in a separate document, it's very 
likely you could find a friendly area director to sponsor them ;-)

                - Chris