[Disman] Seoul minutes of disman WG session
"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Fri, 02 April 2004 05:33 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA10777 for <disman-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 00:33:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B9E7B-0005D7-Jd; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 21:09:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B9BOJ-0002bE-6O for disman@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 18:14:31 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA07649 for <disman@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:14:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B9BOG-0000JW-00 for disman@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 18:14:28 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B9BNH-0000Ch-00 for disman@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 18:13:28 -0500
Received: from turkey.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.126]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B9BMT-00007Z-00; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 18:12:37 -0500
Received: from h-68-164-86-83.snvacaid.dynamic.covad.net ([68.164.86.83] helo=oemcomputer) by turkey.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1B9BMT-0007jN-00; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 15:12:37 -0800
Message-ID: <019701c4183f$3c26d280$7f1afea9@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: proceedings@ietf.org
Cc: "Disman (E-mail)" <disman@ietf.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Subject: [Disman] Seoul minutes of disman WG session
Sender: disman-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: disman-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: disman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>, <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Distributed Management <disman.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:disman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/disman>, <mailto:disman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/disman/>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 15:15:34 -0800
Hi - Minutes for the disman WG session in Seoul The Distributed Management (disman) Working group met for one hour at the IETF meeting at the Lotte Hotel in Seoul on Tuesday, March 2, 2003. Randy Presuhn chaired the session. Shailaja Yadawad and Dan Romascanu kindly provided the notes from which these minutes were assembled. No changes were needed to the posted agenda. The first major item was the review of the status of current work. The Alarm Report Control MIB module was in the RFC editor queue. The Alarm MIB was still in the IESG, and had not yet reached the RFC editor. Sharon Chisholm, one of the document's editors, took the action item to contact the area director, and to inform the WG chair if there were any remaining problems. The Remote Operations MIB update was in working group last call, with only one comment received. The group needs feedback before forwarding it to the IESG. A quick poll of the room revealed that many there had not yet read the update to the Remote Operations MIB, RFC 2925. Consequently an action item for the room was to read the update I-D. The chair will send a request for interoperability reports. The Script MIB appears to be ready to advance to Draft Standard. It is deployed and used, but there was the question of finding editorial resources. Juergen Schoenwaelder, the primary editor, was not at the session. The WG chair took the action item to determine whether there was WG consensus to advance the RFC "as is" since there were no known technical problems, and to request interoperability reports. The situation with the Schedule MIB was identical to that with the Script MIB, so the WG chair took the action item to determine whether it, too, could be advanced "as is". The WG chair called for volunteers to provide editorial assistance. (Subsequently, we heard from the current editor that he'd be able to do this.) Mixed feedback was expressed about the expression MIB. Some find the MIB complicated to implement, and while other members shared how customers are using this MIB. WG members to share implementation reports. Currently only one implementation is known, and there are questions about whether it is worth investing additional effort in this. Only one implementation of the event MIB was discussed in the session. Since Cisco is using it, Elliot Lear would take it as editor if there is another vendor that does it. (Subsequently we learned from Wes Hardaker, who was not able to attend the meeting, that the Event MIB is fairly heavily used by Net-SNMP users, though only for local agent queries.) WG members need to share implementation reports on the Event MIB, RFC 2981. The updates to the Notification Log MIB (RFC 3014) appear to be in fairly good shape for advancement to Draft Standard, but due to workload a new editor is needed to handle these mostly administrative details. The next major item was the review of liaison activity, an item from the ITU on the "structured" probable cause work. Sharon Chisholm agreed to forward the URL of the original liaison to the WG mailing list. Bert Wijnen, our Area Director, provided some helpful clarification on liaisons; the WG chair should email responses directly, copying to Bert and Scott Bradner. The next major item was Juergen Quittek's presentation on an alternative his colleagues implemented to the expression MIB. The discussion focused on why their proposal would be easier to configure or lighter weight than the Expression MIB. In subsequent discussion, Juergen took an action item to determine whether the problem could be solved using objects from RMON groups. The next presentation, by Shailaja Yadawad, provided another look at how the expression MIB problems might be addressed. Entitled "Advanced History Collection", it was inspired by RMON work. The main question was how this MIB could simplify configuration. There was limited discussion, since the I-D had missed the cutoff date. It was agreed that additional discussion would be appropriate on the mailing list after the draft became available. Shailaja took the action item to submit the draft. The group then briefly discussed milestone updates for the charter. The chair will submit proposals to the list, and then, if agreed, to Bert.
- [Disman] Seoul minutes of disman WG session Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Disman] Seoul minutes of disman WG session David T. Perkins