IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Lossless Recording in SIPREC

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Mon, 10 February 2014 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6A01A06FD for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:31:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cWZGGb1QDvlP for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:31:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls6.std.com [192.74.137.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4CA1A05D5 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 13:31:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1ALV7s9012264; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:31:09 -0500
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id s1ALV47w4688672; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:31:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id s1ALV1we4694874; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:31:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:31:01 -0500
Message-Id: <201402102131.s1ALV1we4694874@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-reply-to: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B12F844@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> (keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com)
References: <CF199D4B.7A6E4%rmohanr@cisco.com> <4BEAD79F6904AC4FB1917EBA8006628905C0685D52@SOUEXC01.eu.nice.com> <CF19B110.7A78A%rmohanr@cisco.com> <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF17CEDF53@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net> <CAHBDyN4PfGJZsh1djzgNsB6PCiHQOgKAZ7JLOCm6gMWLJTGD0w@mail.gmail.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B12F844@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Cc: Gerben.Stam@nice.com, dispatch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Lossless Recording in SIPREC
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:31:26 -0000

> From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>

> According to the [Dispatch] charter:
> 
> The Dispatch working group is chartered to consider proposals for
> new work in the RAI area and identify, or help create, an appropriate
> venue for the work.
> 
> I would read this as a working group decision rather than a WG chairs decision.

It seems to me that "lossless recording" is well within the defined
responsibilities (charter) of Siprec.  Siprec may decide that they
ultimately need mechanisms that can only be defined by another WG,
though...

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email