Re: [dispatch] IPv6 Zone Identifiers in URIs (RFC6874bis)
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 21 February 2022 23:48 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37D13A0CE8; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:48:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=pWkkyROw; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=ZEhBTLJ9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KRYtejmZTwZb; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:48:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C2543A0C31; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:48:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7076032020C1; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:48:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:48:51 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=DDnRNRE+HuZY1v JDTXjWCf/oINncPQ6UdIvWwpK6Wu4=; b=pWkkyROwWcoP/iRqowVsVf+y+P8fpv oX3cYL1FOblmAsYP6LKPAWc3qkFS0Zv42PbNMUef9WAsOKxgUzxGc+kB9A0cxZVX BG+zkS9cqiu/D88OgeVOPclWrPFuVZ5c2ioGZpGAYRgxN9BnlDc6NKpHJVKfvCQn woTfWBLyDA8GpNv53HLo9HO2gmVwY10d0w6lH6bnqmkC7SNDhEBgG4pewjiYaE8I /h+Cub6ImPVz85QK+wV9EtZrsWrd97m3G19EH8x4l/FbcaR/ZaoPJOmOMMxkudrn 97Imv/5FrftvJvIvBA9RYQ6depibeyvM3MF3aCAYQa7kMwAro2lHcA/Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=DDnRNRE+HuZY1vJDTXjWCf/oINncPQ6UdIvWwpK6W u4=; b=ZEhBTLJ9IsTuc+RznREdkm8aq84+Y35rU1zv1XoMefQ2LGxy9Hf6KaSKQ 6Rnxy9bNVVdpHE2ZLv0XoLSaaHuzPj5vFf5vhigImb+uFQCPhoqY9SGdqU+/uNZ0 nWvx0RJXv4Mc7U0/lzTttlu52HdADWyIf/t/ySplt9dt2ud/5c9bre9rXzL4zcCk fgCzkfAGSeFShon+0Ig3kRMmwkWBnb1uBpaAgUFcJsGO7lpApMY5jsycbJZoFHhP SEniBtp1DNh/tfmg0Wq0NIw7DTcXgxmeKvJuH5uRG3rGmMDL61t81mW9h1PoVlvD Q/g+i+aYFn4/Q9sY5un9uPWOMqetQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:4iQUYrNMSKvLaAH2Mc0_Q7QRTLHIxEG7fPprcNntUee_5JAlrKISZQ> <xme:4iQUYl-WqxnjfgNRBz4F0E-wqeH8rUlvRTEtVFV-m4ambkCcCULgsNs1i9z7axOGQ nYfOHzQrRhtSESG0w>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:4iQUYqS4HBDcQ7cWaz41eLJtLRRvqQFGYUC8V0KqWjvgvw0qoOPGiyy81Pxo5V6rdng2pkkUsIhpUmrO0Y-lGKijtyCjIe5lPAFI0Bxw6ZOqc-N-TzFmsTOG>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrkeejgddugecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepfeegvdfgjeegvdetuedukeevfefhheelieevjeejkefhffehkeejieekjedtheej necuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdpmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgv th
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:4iQUYvthMV5zPrOL7J3auOp1O6gvUKJ6HXrUTEmxkpBZPbbj60j4bw> <xmx:4iQUYjf-tbKUooo7GuXBQebJa_GtzLLx5ygi65eTG5DbiRlWhOQktA> <xmx:4iQUYr1DfSeeVPkkk1e9n3oqdAWvN8TAVZVM_5GFmais3Zn-ObDgGg> <xmx:4yQUYkEij3fqKZDgwnzF_qH7RgSJ4GnfAvFsR3ACFxOHy0WbloYtyw>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 18:48:49 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <3c47ecf4-f0bc-89a6-3322-4c05b0d4986c@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 10:48:45 +1100
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, dispatch-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <196FEC4C-0D51-4FB0-9F59-5FD201265F46@mnot.net>
References: <67e55e7b-e23c-71d6-8da6-16ae49a8e35b@gmail.com> <3c47ecf4-f0bc-89a6-3322-4c05b0d4986c@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/8EpWBe2TKpXmas3diR1pwbXLU_s>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] IPv6 Zone Identifiers in URIs (RFC6874bis)
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 23:48:58 -0000
If we know it's not going to be implemented by browsers for the foreseeable future and we still choose to publish something, it should be clearly marked as what's effectively a hope-based standard. Cheers, > On 18 Feb 2022, at 6:58 am, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > > FYI, we have recently updated this draft at > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis-03.html > > We opened discussion with various people in the browser community, but > did not find much enthusiasm for implementation. Until there is a great > increase in demand for link-locals to be supported by browsers, the > necessary work seems unlikely to be done. > > However, we believe that this demand will eventually arise and therefore > it's important that the relevant URI syntax is well-defined. There is a > significant change in this version. Following the discussions a few months > ago, and after I spent some time looking into the URI parsers in wget and > Firefox (and a brief look at curl), we propose to drop the "%25" encoding > of "%". The ABNF in this version, originally suggested by Andrew Cady, > reflects that proposal. There is extra explanation in the text. > > The other signficant change is that, as Martin Dürst pointed out, we > also need to formally update the IRI syntax. That was an omission in > RFC6874. > > We are not asking for action by DISPATCH, but of course we'd welcome > feedback. > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > On 09-Jul-21 15:46, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Hi, >> Bob Hinden and I are working on an update to RFC 6874, "Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Address Literals and Uniform Resource Identifiers": >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-carpenter-6man-rfc6874bis/ >> There will be an updated version before the cutoff, and there has >> been quite a bit of discussion already at >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/. >> We expect this to be processed in 6MAN, as RFC 6874 was, but we would like to briefly introduce it to DISPATCH/ART Area since clearly it is not just an Internet Area topic. We're also very much aware that it needs to be looked at by the browser community. >> So this is a request for a short slot to raise awareness. We're not quite sure who would be presenting due to time zone and agenda clash challenges. >> Please keep us in Cc as we are not on the DISPATCH list. > > _______________________________________________ > dispatch mailing list > dispatch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- [dispatch] IPv6 Zone Identifiers in URIs (RFC6874… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [dispatch] IPv6 Zone Identifiers in URIs (RFC… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [dispatch] IPv6 Zone Identifiers in URIs (RFC… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [dispatch] IPv6 Zone Identifiers in URIs (RFC… Bob Hinden
- Re: [dispatch] IPv6 Zone Identifiers in URIs (RFC… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [dispatch] IPv6 Zone Identifiers in URIs (RFC… Brian E Carpenter