Re: [dispatch] Dispatch IETF 118 outcomes & minutes

[Philippe THOMY <[e-mail]>]

Hi Shuping, Jim,

Thank you for taking the JSON-NTV topic into account in the WG dispatch and
I am sorry that I was not able to function properly during the
question/answer session (I was quite stressed, my level of English is not
good and I was not well prepared for the questions asked).

However, here is what I take away from the questions:


   - Relations with OpenAPI, JSON-Schema, YANG, Schema.org, HTTP media:

The questions are relevant and the JSON-NTV proposal must be clearly
positioned in relation to these standards. This will ensure the merits of
the proposal and to better understand how to use it.
-> work in progress



   - Link with CBOR:

A discussion email was sent on November 6 (but I have not yet received any
feedback from WG CBOR).
I am preparing a specific document on this point which presents the
envisaged interface (which remains in the logic of using the JSON layer as
indicated in the comment). This may help to communicate with WG CBOR.


I propose to work on these two subjects and share them in the form of
Internet-Drafts. Feedback on these documents will make it possible to
define the follow-up to be given on this subject.

Is this approach correct or should a particular procedure be considered as
part of the “dispatch” process ?

Have a nice day