Re: [dispatch] draft-levine-herkula-oneclick, additional security consideration
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 14:08 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1117A1294EC for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:08:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CaiJAuOPmvJc for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:08:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 556631294C6 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 06:08:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 2575 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2016 14:08:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 1 Dec 2016 14:08:08 -0000
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:07:43 -0000
Message-ID: <20161201140743.28859.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dispatch@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <724a13e5-e422-b55c-2b36-ba3e63620e48@rolandturner.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/FpfSGn-tz9Rp3YoJeCREb-kW8Ls>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] draft-levine-herkula-oneclick, additional security consideration
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:08:08 -0000
>unsubscribe button (in the dialogue box that could pop up if the user >clicked This is Spam), they established three criteria: > > * that a List-Unsubscribe: header was present > * that the message authenticated, and > * that the sender was in good standing in terms of its complaint rate. > >It may be argued, with some strength, that the third item really makes >no difference, but it would appear to be a relevant consideration to >address in Security Considerations, and perhaps an option to suggest. That's a policy issue. Some mailers care, some don't. R's, John
- [dispatch] draft-levine-herkula-oneclick, additio… Roland Turner
- Re: [dispatch] draft-levine-herkula-oneclick, add… John Levine
- Re: [dispatch] draft-levine-herkula-oneclick, add… Roland Turner
- Re: [dispatch] draft-levine-herkula-oneclick, add… John Levine