Re: [dispatch] Comment on draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-03
"Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com> Tue, 30 October 2012 13:36 UTC
Return-Path: <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C403A21F84C2 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rb-KnxVfu+aR for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com [62.134.46.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B796021F84C1 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MCHP01HTC.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.42.234]) by senmx11-mx.siemens-enterprise.com (Server) with ESMTP id 0EAB61EB8422; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:36:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net ([169.254.1.76]) by MCHP01HTC.global-ad.net ([172.29.42.234]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:36:39 +0100
From: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@siemens-enterprise.com>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>, DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dispatch] Comment on draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-03
Thread-Index: AQHNssfdTBUhy/7z0UKwFjs7nAex45fR4XJQ
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:36:39 +0000
Message-ID: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF0131B2BC@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <508914D1.60207@ericsson.com> <CAHBDyN5p4tmmBZ0EYjAwoQt0cTk8mPmeAxum+e0PdtTw41xhQg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN5p4tmmBZ0EYjAwoQt0cTk8mPmeAxum+e0PdtTw41xhQg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.29.42.225]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF0131B2BCMCHP04MSXglobal_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability@tools.ietf.org" <draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Comment on draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-03
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:36:51 -0000
I support the draft moving forward by whatever means possible. Regards Andy From: dispatch-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dispatch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes Sent: 25 October 2012 16:46 To: DISPATCH Cc: Cullen Jennings; draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [dispatch] Comment on draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-03 Gonzalo has agreed to AD sponsor this document pending feedback from the WG. If anyone has any concerns about progressing this document as such please respond on the list, giving your reasons no later than Nov 1st, 2012. I you agree on the progression of this document, it would also be helpful to reply indicating such. Thanks, Mary Barnes DISPATCH WG co-chair On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com<mailto:Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>> wrote: Hi, the draft below looks good in general. I only have a very minor comment: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-capability-03 When the draft talks about "call setup", it refers to the process whereby an INVITE request is routed to the appropriate user agent. The thing is that some readers will probably think about call set up as the offer/answer exchange. Keeping this in mind, the two first sentences of Section 3 may result confusing for some readers. Even though this is a minor comment, clarifying it should be a matter of editing a few sentences. It should not take long at all. Thanks, Gonzalo _______________________________________________ dispatch mailing list dispatch@ietf.org<mailto:dispatch@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
- [dispatch] Comment on draft-hanes-dispatch-fax-ca… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [dispatch] Comment on draft-hanes-dispatch-fa… Mary Barnes
- Re: [dispatch] Comment on draft-hanes-dispatch-fa… Kevin Fleming
- Re: [dispatch] Comment on draft-hanes-dispatch-fa… Richard Shockey
- Re: [dispatch] Comment on draft-hanes-dispatch-fa… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [dispatch] Comment on draft-hanes-dispatch-fa… bruno.chatras
- Re: [dispatch] Comment on draft-hanes-dispatch-fa… Hutton, Andrew