Re: [dispatch] Reminder: Deadlines for IETF-95

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 21 March 2016 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4870C12D127 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6e92UDmsTQyc for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 881AB12D104 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.10] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u2LMRAGp070613 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:27:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.10]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:27:11 -0500
Message-ID: <8BF3C829-2DD0-4305-8098-1BD1F23FDEDC@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <D315C188.18297B%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
References: <CAHBDyN4hgTg1o4On39C6sKwO9y=yy+46SEJB1DJrAfaUfhir=Q@mail.gmail.com> <8119825D-F91F-4494-AE59-39E3956B02F1@nostrum.com> <D2F9BF7A.17C6C3%jon.peterson@neustar.biz> <D315C188.18297B%jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/SoBcAr6hwPxp4rw8fg6YbbSqHYc>
Cc: DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Reminder: Deadlines for IETF-95
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 22:27:20 -0000

I'm interested ;-)

Seriously, though, there was already issue expressed for the subject 
back when we pre-announced it.

Ben.

On 21 Mar 2016, at 17:20, Peterson, Jon wrote:

> This is our submission on media confidentiality negotiated via SIP. If
> there's interest, we could discuss at DISPATCH.
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-peterson-dispatch-rtpsec-00.txt
>
>
> Jon Peterson
> Neustar, Inc.
>
>
>
> On 2/29/16, 3:53 PM, "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> wrote:
>
>>
>> I just wanted to confirm that Ben here is correct. This idea came out 
>> of a
>> discussion in Yokohama about identifying the best practices for media
>> security when setting up sessions with SIP, and in particular the 
>> glue
>> that binds security in SIP to SDP and to RTP. This would invoke 
>> things
>> like STIR, and would also potentially nod to more opportunistic 
>> approaches
>> like those outlined in Alan's draft, as media confidentiality is one 
>> of
>> the more important security properties in this post-PERPASS world of 
>> ours.
>>
>> So, we expect to have a draft before the deadline - happy to discuss 
>> the
>> general topic here in the meantime if there's interest.
>>
>> Jon Peterson
>> Neustar, Inc.
>>
>> On 2/11/16, 5:56 PM, "dispatch on behalf of Ben Campbell"
>> <dispatch-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I understand that Jon, Ekr, Richard, and Russ plan to submit a draft 
>>> on
>>> security recommendations for point-to-point, SIP-signaled RTP in 
>>> time
>>> for Buenos Aires. While I would be pleasantly surprised if the
>>> discussion is far enough along by then for a charter proposal, I 
>>> think
>>> discussion in DISPATCH would be worthwhile.
>>>
>>> So, please consider this notice of their intent to propose a 
>>> discussion
>>> topic, on their behalf.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Ben.
>>>
>>> On 10 Feb 2016, at 7:54, Mary Barnes wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Just a reminder of the DISPATCH WG deadlines for IETF-95:
>>>> https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/dispatch/trac/wiki
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  - February 22, 2016. Cutoff date to notify the chairs/DISPATCH WG 
>>>> of
>>>>  plans to submit a proposal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  - February 29, 2016. Cutoff for charter proposals for topics.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  - March 7, 2016. Announcement of topics that have been dispatched 
>>>> for
>>>>  IETF-95.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  - March 21, 2016. Draft deadline.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Mary
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dispatch mailing list
>>>> dispatch@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dispatch mailing list
>>> dispatch@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
>>