[dispatch] DISPATCH Topics - IETF-88
Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Fri, 18 October 2013 22:24 UTC
Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D1D21F8423 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.374
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.374 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eTSGXAltx3XK for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-x230.google.com (mail-qe0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D782421F9A43 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f48.google.com with SMTP id d4so2370209qej.35 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+zFp8hyHh0YZjq1IWW2Xc/xXCeWMNhWYYhZ/DTsvbN4=; b=jfYRmKthMX3bovM5skiVR2MRMdM8ZdDAYTCCKcD4q4jmOkZU7CY5etI2m1eMpmHk4R 3U0yWdKfBpLx4HDe1+zrEuUuRfkQFDjAdAm2/d7e/aWyDz4pwhYXWG6u6U2ioF6uzH0Z AGzjc19zQoCTtkejiEHL1ocY+k4ijLPLCMxZXjT7A2qw28KOSr6OrOl3EOpWBf/DulNr IonB+s02yJQiudMurRA8v3ABkLqWVVEZB2YnEjIyHp46uNlX2Jdy9AtqJfSTJ9yf+T1F RDn8aPAcfDVmWP9BY8qYLnwG9dZAQXJ8clvGKJRRw5uWGVlZzrFSupcVcN1y2ZjFmjoX 1X9Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.165.129 with SMTP id i1mr5334469qay.114.1382135059113; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.117.234 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 15:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:24:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN57X1inJT0KQLP9j02QfzgP4hMttPSGk-+7f_U4eCySTw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0158b11e3af7bb04e90b65c2"
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "rai-ads@tools.ietf.org" <rai-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [dispatch] DISPATCH Topics - IETF-88
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:24:26 -0000
Hi all, Based on WG discussions and consultation with the ADs, the following topic is proposed for discussion at the DISPATCH WG session at the IETF-88 meeting: 1) SDP negotiation of DataChannel sub-protocols: Document: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ejzak-dispatch-webrtc-data-channel-sdpneg/ Charter Proposal: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg05072.html We will post the preliminary agenda shortly, but the plan is to allocate 45-50 minutes for this discussion. Since we have been allocated a 2.5 hour slot, the ADs are considering options for using the other 1.5 hours of the slot. The following topics/documents (items 2-6) that have been put forth since IETF-87 (and some before) will not be discussed because a problem statement is needed and/or needs refinement, and additional WG feedback/discussion is required. The proponents should have already received feedback from the WG chairs. 2) http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-klatsky-dispatch-ipv6-impact-ipv4/ 3) http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ilan-dispatch-subscription-diff-list-01.txt Discussion: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg05063.html 4) Call Management and USSD Discussion: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg05062.html 5) SIP Problem statement Discussion: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg05017.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg05041.html The following document(s) is not planned to be progressed: 6) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kaplan-dispatch-sip-205-response/ This document was motivated by the STRAW WG, however, that WG has decided to just the 200 response code, so there does not appear to be a need for this new response code: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/straw/current/threads.html#00162 The following document has been dispatched since the IETF-87 meeting: 7) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johansson-sip-dual-stack-01 Dispatched to the SIPCORE WG. Note: SIPCORE WG is NOT meeting at IETF-88. Discussion of this document should continue on the SIPCORE WG mailing list. Note, this document has not yet been agreed as a WG document - the chairs will make that call for consensus at some point in the future. Thanks, Mary DISPATCH WG co-chair
- [dispatch] DISPATCH Topics - IETF-88 Mary Barnes