[dispatch] draft-holmberg-dispatch-received-realm-03: syntax comment
Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com> Mon, 19 September 2016 10:55 UTC
Return-Path: <brett@broadsoft.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D7812B316 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=broadsoft-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2i5VqZGZ2YXa for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:55:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2CE12B102 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id h127so107904349lfh.0 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadsoft-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=oakQu4oeO2hNov9HHqInHQPAmvy/xIpI5w6m4FsS8ng=; b=0BEy1VgIn14QbmZaGTDd5N/tLArWT999k2IGwMMf4Qftkov90h82gtCtUGH2oZ/e/3 p29Bs9xFShCKMWCyfxZlgYLHPWibTxMS3CFsafaIBzkfMvXoeryYa+mZdpMgaVOXdOTw hITcu2PRO/bRnr83GJegoIyGGeI++bPJ6NGoyWD30Hr6bmtO7HB57U4cmEvtfpmEa+gR zLRVE8RZWP/WWEMsvF7TwQHr6Sqgy2b/NhIhBUJFd3pEWyECX0C0tva4/WE4TVf2xtT3 VOofvvnrB6mXMAgEyt3t6wToHMAHaEC3C1U3XNW60i9MI6RwO92+JYt9gPwjLSWn06nW Ckzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:thread-index:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=oakQu4oeO2hNov9HHqInHQPAmvy/xIpI5w6m4FsS8ng=; b=DLFiGSqUOuy5RwVkE/QOWff2kB6zKAvMCSVctkBw6vV7a2B4zNdRnjmOE40W5sW+Cp wuy5RoxwSs85kxe/8Jruj5BvSpEHzfKGE1ATNYHiIEIe0huHRWcL+wP63EJLXQ6FMLIZ WNdugfc2hYjEOtdMfpHCzQDU0g8/TByhN/kWJaRAPShzqpiauz1OmdGOAhBk/Tj/Cc9y sKPOo1of9BFMW/lo9bsjKSgJsqVkPKC0gG3Ljkh6qi1JBGZKMmwTfORgsdCl22enhJ/a Eu2Aukshb2YMuG6qKhpo4iaMG7Tq22xVI4jDUurqQTx9k72qNtxB0P63lp51n5Q0Yw7A MCLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMdvbodo/JACR1lAmsVcGgTPH6V9KQyWZlXa2N2WCokP9SlDQUoMsapzQ6tX2xRhlYx4EATnu/GBeRHw5gh
X-Received: by 10.25.219.154 with SMTP id t26mr9531702lfi.116.1474282512513; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 03:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdISZDOEAso7uGHqTF6Amtr6489EAg==
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 06:55:10 -0400
Message-ID: <5b403598e6e3970be9885ebeb973ca68@mail.gmail.com>
To: dispatch@ietf.org, draft-holmberg-dispatch-received-realm@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/YU0UgzLK2w8PO0hUST4vS6Yfoxo>
Subject: [dispatch] draft-holmberg-dispatch-received-realm-03: syntax comment
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:55:16 -0000
Hi, Concerning draft-holmberg-dispatch-received-realm-03 section 5.5.2, the Via parameter syntax does not appear to be backward compatible with via-extension which is a generic-param. To remain backward compatible, the received-realm value would need to fall within the syntax of token, host, or quoted-string. Thanks, Brett
- [dispatch] draft-holmberg-dispatch-received-realm… Brett Tate
- Re: [dispatch] draft-holmberg-dispatch-received-r… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [dispatch] draft-holmberg-dispatch-received-r… Christer Holmberg