[dispatch] draft-kyzivat-dispatch-trs-call-info-purpose-00: comments

[Brett Tate <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

The following are some comments concerning
draft-kyzivat-dispatch-trs-call-info-purpose-00.

Thanks,
Brett

------

General comment: It might be better to introduce a new header instead of
using Call-Info.  For instance, is the following RFC 3261 section 20.9
recommendation acceptable for the new purpose value?

"Therefore, it is RECOMMENDED that a UA only render the information in the
Call-Info
header field if it can verify the authenticity of the element that
originated the header field and trusts that element."

Section 2: Concerning the example, the sip-uri should be within brackets.

Section 2: Concerning the example, the original-identity should not be
within quotes.

Section 3 paragraph 1: Comparing it to an identify header (instead of
Contact) might be more accurate since it might be displayed to the user
and has a billing impact.  However, I guess that the same could be said
about Contact and they both can be spoofed.