IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] DISPATCH IETF 111 meeting - preliminary outcomes and draft minutes

westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk> Tue, 27 July 2021 12:20 UTC

Return-Path: <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EB03A2473 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 05:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CNqB7JT12DKP for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 05:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp001-out.apm-internet.net (smtp001-out.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B18563A246E for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 05:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 12966 invoked from network); 27 Jul 2021 12:13:44 -0000
X-APM-Out-ID: 16273880241296
X-APM-Authkey: 255286/0(159927/0) 877
Received: from unknown (HELO zimbra003.verygoodemail.com) (85.119.248.218) by smtp001.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 27 Jul 2021 12:13:44 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1697480F26; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:13:44 +0100 (BST)
Received: from zimbra003.verygoodemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra003.verygoodemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id JeprWiUmYwtB; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:13:44 +0100 (BST)
Received: from phage-rock.fritz.box (p2e5a5dc4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [46.90.93.196]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E742680A6A; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:13:43 +0100 (BST)
From: westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
Message-Id: <AE41FC5C-71FB-49E4-B02E-09AB7EC1EF7C@westhawk.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_38089D14-84E6-447F-946E-57EDE13A49FA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 14:13:36 +0200
In-Reply-To: <LO2P123MB3599783EEC14F3E314CA9BBBD7E89@LO2P123MB3599.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Cc: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, dispatch chairs <dispatch-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Kirsty P <Kirsty.p=40ncsc.gov.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <LO2P123MB3599783EEC14F3E314CA9BBBD7E89@LO2P123MB3599.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/cyy4mvjWWhTuRkIXtGdD0uqEX-Y>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] DISPATCH IETF 111 meeting - preliminary outcomes and draft minutes
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:20:31 -0000


> On 26 Jul 2021, at 23:30, Kirsty P <Kirsty.p=40ncsc.gov.uk@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> SDP Security Descriptions is NOT RECOMMENDED and Historic: consensus was sub-optimal. There was support for revisiting the space currently standardised by SDP, but not on direction (whether to do a deprecation with/without replacement). Future paths suggested included: mmusic, a new WG, more work required for it to be ready, or a BoF (said in chat) to vet the idea further.
My sense is that there was a rough consensus around a goal to make it possible to deprecate SDES - but the required steps were unclear.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status