Re: [dispatch] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-ietf-cellar-00-00: (with COMMENT)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 22 October 2015 15:19 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F3A1A21B1; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1cvbW0YLIYtE; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86B291A1F1D; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.9] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t9MFIxPh054015 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:19:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.9]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:18:59 -0500
Message-ID: <2D88BA7A-6B89-465E-91FC-4FB6DC422434@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151022133935.26487.12997.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20151022133935.26487.12997.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.2r5141)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/ffXVB0XJvpFshGGshlkUnT-2OUY>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, cellar-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-ietf-cellar-00-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:19:10 -0000
(+dispatch for now; we will setup a cellar list shortly). Does anyone have thoughts on Stephen's comment below? Thanks! Ben. On 22 Oct 2015, at 8:39, Stephen Farrell wrote: > Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for > charter-ietf-cellar-00-00: Yes > [...] > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-cellar/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > I wonder is there any interest in the security of the archived > stuff here, and whether the WG would want to possibly take > that on, most likely later. I'm not saying they should, as that > could be a lot of possibly contentious work, but if they did > want to do it, it'd be good to say in the charter.
- Re: [dispatch] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-i… Ben Campbell
- Re: [dispatch] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-i… Steve Lhomme
- Re: [dispatch] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-i… Michael Niedermayer
- Re: [dispatch] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-i… Ben Campbell
- Re: [dispatch] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-i… Ben Campbell
- Re: [dispatch] Stephen Farrell's Yes on charter-i… Michael Niedermayer