Re: [dispatch] draft-goessner-dispatch-jsonpath-00.txt

[Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>]

On 2020-07-14, at 07:14, Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> I would like to initiate discussion for draft-goessner-dispatch-jsonpath:
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-goessner-dispatch-jsonpath-00.html
> 
> It says:
> 
>> This document picks up the popular JSONPath specification dated
>> 2007-02-21 and provides a more normative definition for it.
>> It is intended as a submission to the IETF DISPATCH WG, in order to
>> find the right way to complete standardization of this specification.
>> In its current state, it is a strawman document showing what needs to
>> be covered.

The result of the discussion at IETF108 was:

> Carsten Bormann presented [JSON Path](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-goessner-dispatch-jsonpath/). There is considerable interest in the work, and people think this might be a good candidate for a focused working group. Carsten will propose charter text to be discussed on the list. (Some discussion might occur on a separate JSON Path list, but the charter discussion will eventually come back to DISPATCH)

We now have had the discussion about a proposed charter over at the JSON Path list, and the resulting proposed charter, based on an initial proposal by Tim Bray, is at:

https://github.com/jsonpath-wg/charter/blob/master/charter.txt

I have set a reply-to to [e-mail].  The IETF mailman recently has been ignoring that, so here’s the manual version: Please keep the discussion that is relevant to the dispatch process on the dispatch list (and keep spinoff threads that are not really relevant to that to the JSONPath list).

Grüße, Carsten