IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dispatch] Progressing draft-holmberg-dispatch-rfc7315-updates as AD sponsored

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Mon, 07 March 2016 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D591B42E6 for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:33:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GkidIFTWJ4YP for <dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:33:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22b.google.com (mail-yw0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBC351B42DC for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id g127so96320851ywf.2 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 07:33:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=1WWFbXp51K5Cn+KsWpI3ngKu0NdUJsfaC1Ss+T60hoA=; b=TGz3+CHVuz8oenk+7Qp2j6Dq/tNW6GB0s9LrGxYp0EHrzXBhb+o5BTiUnCksFkYLFD vio8ymVRGasIYpkLDJOZvZmtzK3J+zJt8mQcoWjL1KMiyaw58iJ44B5ts3DPjVDVqouv +maLQT2EXSJUGYj8CssOnLJB0W2k05FIC8MA8IwumC+x8j0MEKyQU0ii0CmZb/0H/8Hl vREWgFIVS6SflcGdGc3ub5cQ14ruq2kZNOm0OaiLvDIV67G3gx0SvB/OKdK6y7m/TcYt hNu17Od1rS3YBHai6wrzA/zvPGV2pcFnn4sSNOCzHpJzF5AyYonBkxuziaRG7rLXkBK5 TFXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=1WWFbXp51K5Cn+KsWpI3ngKu0NdUJsfaC1Ss+T60hoA=; b=TsngNM4jijhNip4f8wu1a8V1PIloBWUTFrOU63Tv+/To6AM7J+JLU7+6A1K9cfIBW5 z2jL2XPPm5IVwugaE3LpEcaFu7m++nJGC64MXkKkT7NQMubiP9KcHuVII6BmQHToeuvX iv0KaOf4kLeVC+Ou2dhc50Y7xiByy1/7i5X8MdjpJtLrYxCNNPzO8H5n3P0HHpM8vVcg cPHnpBTlELa5+9CBNYUxkbDHc0gUKrBkJNjJb6JOYRz4q5m6fcSO+AkPefPEOC0xRapk BX6irqe9AKcHWb9AJH1lupWDc2GizObjFq9Lk3kT/K09qZXomCqIy/MUzxz6wpmJPFrC 2dZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKEuCRu1z1RGdMyZ0iDbtLJ4iyRa0VrxcaFLI2ZaZ0cjhJq9iCh3o1QSDVDc23LygPdvMKZDFymCTc6nw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.34.133 with SMTP id i127mr13333539ywi.153.1457364817125; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 07:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.37.105.196 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 09:33:37 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN7iOPZN_jjd0_E5r+UG1jswY=-y17pr0skvPq5bJ2SrpA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: DISPATCH <dispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114091bc3ba80d052d7730af"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/kSfsVTUruLfRanLT4eRh3XgcKZ4>
Subject: [dispatch] Progressing draft-holmberg-dispatch-rfc7315-updates as AD sponsored
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 15:33:39 -0000

Hi folks,

This document has been proposed to be progressed as AD sponsored:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-holmberg-dispatch-rfc7315-updates/
The document has been carefully reviewed and it is now ready to move
forward - Jean Mahoney is the shepherd.

I don't anticipate anyone would have concerns about this decision, given
that's how RFC 7315 was progressed and this update has actually been much
more carefully reviewed.  However, f anyone has any final comments, please
post no later than Friday, March 11th, 2016.  Note, that you will also
still have IETF LC to provide any comments.

Regards,
Mary.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email