[dmarc-ietf] Request for feedback: draft-ser-authentication-results-openpgp

Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr> Mon, 19 October 2020 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <contact@emersion.fr>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EBA3A0C39 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=emersion.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jIGmFTXKZ3HJ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-40136.protonmail.ch (mail-40136.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD38A3A0C25 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:48:31 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emersion.fr; s=protonmail2; t=1603144121; bh=MBagcCsVmB7Kbb13o89cKaG7YwNC9HB0VFCpXnhOMXg=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:From; b=XzU3Og0+G5btPzXKy1AMcdyvO2ULvlC1GA65oIsukJS403ITMQ8kMv6H/2hq3q6X5 w8yBuhIxc+URtE/eAcQF8vfJfIw00iqGNHENOkcclge2a0NHpz4brVmj4nAGWep5Vk J1wT12XG5zKf2znWSrHC/Huz65Pgm/AkoOaxG7QFlucxsN8RuQ6N94oh8I7PnyUURb 4yuHux5siKEtaTP39laTnPCwbBh2qUky32vc4Q74emDWTI63vQO8IrAA/1JfHTq0k0 g8t548dWMbruuttd3Jv4kSAs8Z2E2b0f/Z4olpRFxbzJYwLXUHLz1ALQ1qfWD3NG1A 9OHTIACz+mrmA==
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
From: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Reply-To: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Message-ID: <ZxWD3Yo-oiRI8Rq8k9H-7vG3Rgogp5lhNRwW3JcDUpFjHlfxgubW8rC5g4jQKWnhFazItAexGXsB4xMb69mZg2jRtuXEC7l1GxfmqdBbCOU=@emersion.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/06cJ2JY9FD8NAVirg7l38fPULok>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Request for feedback: draft-ser-authentication-results-openpgp
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 21:48:50 -0000

Hi all,

I've submitted a draft for a new Authentication-Results method a while
back [1]. I'd like to get some feedback.

My use-case is: on a mailing list system [2], I'd like to display PGP
signature status, if a PGP signature is present. I'd like the
verification to happen once in a mail filter. Having a standardized
Authentication-Results method that mail filters can generate and mail
user agents can display would be helpful. A very similar thing is
already implemented for DKIM.

Does this sounds like something worth doing?

Thanks,

Simon

[1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ser-authentication-results-openpgp/
[2]: https://lists.sr.ht