[dmarc-ietf] Requesting Last Call for DMARCbis

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 20 November 2024 18:47 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 10:47:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbbJpKdKifHCbk1jr3ASzWcK=-jfpBnSrxLfezF-AAggw@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006f9cec06275c9411"
Message-ID-Hash: B3TSMAO3IKJRKXL65LF6WHGPI77OXMJJ
Precedence: list
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Requesting Last Call for DMARCbis
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/2h9uCq6qZzEegyxf_iB56CjzMtk>

I am about to request IETF-wide Last Call for DMARCbis.  For those
unfamiliar, this is the next formal step in document development.
Basically:

* WG document
* WG last call
* Publication request
* AD Evaluation <= YOU ARE HERE
* IETF Last Call
* IESG Evaluation
* RFC Editor
* publication

My read and that of the chairs is that the issues raised during the current
phase have been discussed and resolved by consensus, and we're ready to
proceed on that basis.  As I mentioned earlier, the next phase will likely
produce additional feedback from a wider audience which the WG will also
have to deal with before it goes to the IESG.

Last Call will take two weeks once it starts.  During that time, please
don't just wait for that to end; that's two weeks you can spend organizing
yourselves around and developing whatever other document(s) you would like
to see completed before the March deadline.  You should do this in parallel
with dealing with any feedback that comes in from the Last Call.

Away we go.

-MSK, ART AD

[dmarc-ietf] Requesting Last Call for DMARCbis Murray S. Kucherawy