[dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30

The editors and chairs think version -30 resolves the open issues and is
ready for a final look, so this message starts a working group last call
for the DMARCbis spec.  Because of the upcoming IETF 119 meeting, we’ll let
this go until the end of March, so there’s lots of time to review.

Please post to the DMARC mailing list by 31 March, giving your last call
comments (which should include “I read it and I think it’s ready” as
well).  If you have significant issues to raise that have not already been
discussed and closed, please post each of those as a separate thread.
Minor issues and editorial comments can just be posted here, to this
thread, and we can split them off if necessary.

Please do keep in mind that we have discussed this at great length and over
a long time period.  Therefore, please do NOT ask to re-open settled issues
because you still disagree with the result.  Significant issues raised at
this point need to be accompanied by a clear, understandable explanation of
why this is a NEW argument.

Barry

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 3:05 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.txt is now available. It is a
> work
> item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance
> (DMARC) WG of the IETF.
>
>    Title:   Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and
> Conformance (DMARC)
>    Authors: Todd M. Herr
>             John Levine
>    Name:    draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.txt
>    Pages:   72
>    Dates:   2024-02-28
>
> Abstract:
>
>    This document describes the Domain-based Message Authentication,
>    Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) protocol.
>
>    DMARC permits the owner of an email author's domain name to enable
>    verification of the domain's use, to indicate the Domain Owner's or
>    Public Suffix Operator's message handling preference regarding failed
>    verification, and to request reports about the use of the domain
>    name.  Mail receiving organizations can use this information when
>    evaluating handling choices for incoming mail.
>
>    This document obsoletes RFCs 7489 and 9091.
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.html
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>