Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16.txt

Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com> Wed, 01 August 2018 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@sethblank.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469DB130E76 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 14:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qSisCLS69qYl for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 14:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD4C21271FF for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 14:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 8-v6so99630oip.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 14:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KPOLHvtLz8/Rvl/8tczszWA6dm4o3VIOxsDdRNuKL2k=; b=vwbbFMeiNW0kYTdkzkP3L3TmrU24jFM4k/AfRTTmfN4SdxaPRYVXh+pQTup0dvkUWE tRJCkQ9DoP7yWi1Vy//ct8yCGryfzcxktYBiWjHpnrQPNin5I4xPx1WRGaSWdI3x6mm8 BQR6sBOLxN0gUw5qZJLmUP+gO80knsvpOhV2FEAVkuWxvgnwL4ATi2ujB4IdQLa6rN0c XUTGic6VJcRDl4uLgB+5KSjLgS+KfhN3sGiOhkFwdKafkusjzakW9stY7ceN8AjDkTb5 bR35wrfvAF2sTJq3iLBeElV16h+PpdIXVvRMMFknh5u6Jhs5IyLmbD8xSl0hfPLGxP/N 6ZBQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=KPOLHvtLz8/Rvl/8tczszWA6dm4o3VIOxsDdRNuKL2k=; b=tLIN1PeJVEGgb+lektb/IHLEiGDCclzrCgAr6hGaybGQmcXz8JM6EPvBUMn6avjUBc 0g+oXeqIFkiDWJAChtnkwdEkK3h7LZ1w6jaQPrAxN1Oo3b9UsrJz/XERyXaRCdcYFDyR N1tjS6M/8z1mhIyNSV3PNbwuaEKVNaDdk597rrtaLpqfUMkf5QhtYM4C0s/6vfrR+GCR FODzWA+g5JGBU7uI6PNikRDsKJwiSTJUQ+bArtqfiFgEJGWnhxXK/CwSqr7chmburRGh TMIJXlFmiloDHf3jGJo3Bjro4JeAlAJ1acwq2gZyr+PRrev76ksNvPKZJvVRo+OAC6pU xwtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGxVFV6R4m60IHXG1+rC83EHfPnZqr28UhZZxFReEUcgPuPh+R2 V/+/+a2+wj9TSpDgYf8dMFRqeNkCbWDpILaERAc2tFZI
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfdgzCQCCsFHNYphJB/xUOlXXx9IIrx+1L6pyAWiFdGblwDqYVLFLWxy/giWM75Tkqya7nayCKntRn3FZ/qjiA=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:cdc2:: with SMTP id d185-v6mr6696oig.350.1533157922637; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 14:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:2646:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 14:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1533143665.3889.45.camel@wemonitoremail.com>
References: <153185962729.12680.10783427723792084937@ietfa.amsl.com> <1533143665.3889.45.camel@wemonitoremail.com>
From: Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 14:11:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD2i3WNHTF6XoL2n6b_aCu0UUbd36PMGNrFVRFNwFowjx-2kvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005d334805726625ce"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Fwdp4wpHRSFt_hwSnZLuLKsVvJI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-16.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 21:12:06 -0000

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Ken O'Driscoll <ken=40wemonitoremail.com@
dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

>
> Apologies if this has already been caught by others.
>
> Just spotted some small typos in section 8. Was reading this specific
> section in connection with something GDPR (the fun!) related.
>
> 8.  Privacy Considerations
>
>    The Authenticated Received Chain provides a verifiable record of the
>    handlers for a message.  This record may include Personally
>    Identifiable Information such as IP address and domain names.  Such
>    information is also including in existing header fields such as the
>    "Received" header field.
>
>
> a) Suggest "IP addresses" to match plural for "domain names" or make it "an
> IP address".
>
> b) Replace "including" with "included" because it's grammatically
> incorrect.
>
> c) Suggest "exiting non-ARC related header fields" to distinguish that
> these are absolutely nothing to do with the protocol. It may be obvious to
> us but  not to those who may discount implementation because they think it
> adds new risk.
>


Thanks for these catches; all suggested changes have been made.



>
> Ken.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>