IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10.txt

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Sun, 17 March 2024 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1688EC14F5FD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 09:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=tana.it header.b="Ws+UReAA"; dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.b="DaEb0r/d"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xyAMcjIsfAaz for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 09:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [94.198.96.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D41CC14F5FA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 09:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=epsilon; t=1710691934; bh=zhrfQbkcqLZOFMRU1Y5kXBr5PpYZmlFzchvWXKxrMbg=; h=Author:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=Ws+UReAA5Uo5+1Y9mOXGq4OgFUNxg7O3avQH43iXEEvXurl4rAitAWedkC6h3Vt4T 13I0+GHqEXRjcUo34RGAA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1710691934; bh=zhrfQbkcqLZOFMRU1Y5kXBr5PpYZmlFzchvWXKxrMbg=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=DaEb0r/dEB4x28n4M19HMzVnd0PVdMatZOh2OGKjJvx9aqtEI31tOa+iA20Enc0r2 WBsOhO0v5cnERFraZ+weDf+KlICfmll297MP8ray1QKUhXUBrWsW9bxYdjUfgqtc06 gCIof0brtIZK48pqwcP9T1wun6rnUA4nEctd9xgeiXz6th6O8267j/H2fRFFS
Original-Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10.txt
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.120] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.120]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC090.0000000065F7165D.00000C7A; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 17:12:13 +0100
Message-ID: <cdea47e2-f905-4600-a8fd-a2c82dc33eb2@tana.it>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 17:12:13 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US, it-IT
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <171069064070.10700.603401630899914763@ietfa.amsl.com>
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <171069064070.10700.603401630899914763@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/K7ts_0i-JdoRlq65vH26BKLevEI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:12:28 -0000

On Sun 17/Mar/2024 16:50:40 +0100 internet-drafts wrote:
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10.txt is now available. It
> is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting &
> Conformance (DMARC) WG of the IETF.
> 
>     Title:   Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) Failure Reporting
>     Authors: Steven M Jones
>              Alessandro Vesely
>     Name:    draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10.txt
>     Pages:   16
>     Dates:   2024-03-17


However we close the fifth point of issue 133[*], I added a new paragraph to delimit failure reporting scope:

      3. Other Failure Reports

     This document only describes DMARC failure reports. DKIM failure reports
     [RFC6651] and SPF failure reports [RFC6652] are described in their own
     documents. A Report Generator issuing a DMARC failure report may or may not
     simultaneously issue also a failure report specific to the failed
     authentication mechanism, according to its policy.

It adds RFC665{1,2} as Informative References.

Keep it?  Change it, but how?  Strike it?


Best
Ale

[*]
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/issues/133#issuecomment-1997599216
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-vgm9QIlRbr4yEgtaY39-U6Ryx0


> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting/
> 
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10.html
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email