Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Mon, 16 November 2020 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918333A13F5 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:40:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MUnx33MnHBYi for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:40:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 276D13A13CA for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:40:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id n129so18470099iod.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:40:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CLsZ7r7H6j5d1Tbv4E5vkZMngzyk+oqDZ8Q5ugQZ2ms=; b=VEN/dA3wgewf5z6UWUpbxx7IIpi2baZkY8DhpCr9UziaD2/EkwaBZjNUFyVTL/BPDj xjfdoofLfx1N0EP51wDLCqW/IQs4oNfM8dLMgO8s7XPPRLF2NfmReUJu2l6LqzlRUScm NnVqx+7Bz0X5OLAHr9jJWL60RZbgOf/Pg3uM8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CLsZ7r7H6j5d1Tbv4E5vkZMngzyk+oqDZ8Q5ugQZ2ms=; b=oEonurQtbZxaWxu5L3ddF1H+w9nnl0JreLdkmwz65xMPW5wkOhmC7a8eUIltY/+vMq E+SP4KdThoqoc3L4ygaFnlkPO5VWnAqCJZJ8hHRh0pU+HSfXVqFxewyVAmlpttwY6TFn R1Wdt19cbcc1pngeZEG9j7WW4GFzquyu4WED/5IANMi4svzz+I2PHRe0eGC0Ghgi3dBt +Fheuynx7KBWW1rIpz947XJnaBC0SDHuG/85MKpsA9T4YumvBkMPpIXCcTZiLBQw9ypS BHNF/2y7yNoOTJ9pskn/ELc9yID6rOCgW19excbOVkLf6V0kfRqnlYcTsS459eY3vmsH B40w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532RhGrxWVasYfvQ3MTxXhMQlW6ULM4+rrzNqzOYCv061POnMOrH P3lVQoaBXgGbGeFHw8g/Jts1mrgPukTYuSo7sX8idg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzCober13S1XfYIAC+qleojEP8pAFTVbaIJpAy2EoAzIYBzpdixGCQPjOR2byJwGB4VCtPUFY63nde1/ul3Kqc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:626:: with SMTP id h6mr715935jar.15.1605552009151; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:40:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+HWEK=wm5WLTcgiB0JBY0GubntOp3Qhzfr68YB2__RRNg@mail.gmail.com> <20201115202114.E4225271B9ED@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20201115202114.E4225271B9ED@ary.qy>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:39:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1odbyif2=cgkkWHfrv26vzoZh-GANogdSgXMWx=eJU9YQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002ca23105b43db5de"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/NwV0gDWJjtb-gJhlpHV_5NntuOM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:40:14 -0000

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 12:21 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> In article <CADyWQ+HWEK=
> wm5WLTcgiB0JBY0GubntOp3Qhzfr68YB2__RRNg@mail.gmail.com> you write:
> >
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08&url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-09
> >
> >Please review the changes and offer up comments to the working group.
>
> I looked at it, seems fine as an experiment.
>
> If we end up changing the way regular DMARC looks for Org domains, PSD
> might become redundant. Or not.


+1 on both counts.

--Kurt