IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] Re: Proposed Recharter to Conclude the ARC Experiment

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 10 March 2026 05:26 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dmarc@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237E3C763FBB for <dmarc@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="J5AmnVlX"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="YSfq/5JV"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yxHPeoagefvK for <dmarc@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA0DDC763FB6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 43661 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2026 05:26:47 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=aa8a69afab97.k2603; t=1773120397; x=1773465997; bh=Q/9r/OtN0uAbj6PZvpGbM3RCSvUzAfDuY9y/8EdZtH8=; b=J5AmnVlXe3vxguDMcxLVXDUBNmI0UTdf/4xdhQv0f+t5ATUbRi8MewJN7yWLTh9sx13xep4XkPVa3sJeu3aiRG4TDz/hezzAlnFlhUf823ZYfTHMC1xAbqnHlvy6sgFPWRs55rt4ssAKG88YJySlJPTPzyJ/K1GqYjiCxzIbBGSkkcUC3QbMKh4cVn+9Ma3eTinm2hNrsPVSra8kl0krtRYdasvbOjO0Z2dsq/MkUGK/EIH2pViizGFbGu1DcWqq0VgRzPrFRwIpYqvFb2jnZqF1IKxJx9pM167KErE4//NbevfELDtI68QqUGpYeY0ZCqqv0OgLiDID1bcUw+JDIw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=aa8a69afab97.k2603; bh=Q/9r/OtN0uAbj6PZvpGbM3RCSvUzAfDuY9y/8EdZtH8=; b=YSfq/5JVzlHfileIoza198JC+vMEclOqTl7/sj7UGwKzojh6f1n53B0ryYbWAwfLfbw0+PPCMJjb/+QLVZRPoU2wZ0DprJXFihkcV5lJuNofpq1ucAUcyurPB+YVlLCxxxCGeOY5vp4Uu7LTPmZE92s3cmPwSjlseyNJJ8hinOZqtHVMlmyKQK4HXpFvEAiuQQv5RhkL8wh3o9vv6FAaVAyejQUBgGT9E/0uZgz9RDk4KDE4+fHshJaw/G+N9TnMJSq8OQU5wr35OK5kika77nQNiGqgkYbwz3d3u2vJVPmq+dOq7w7TgzYiVxaXo9rSJBpjvHzH/uueg9VYsiGyBw==
Received: from ary.local ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 10 Mar 2026 05:26:46 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1106CFBACE11; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 10:56:44 +0530 (IST)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 10:56:44 +0530
Message-Id: <20260310052645.1106CFBACE11@ary.local>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAD2i3WOcT3A7c+_3bNNa4pd-yutaTaz-gZwLdEqUX5hmg0Wrww@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
References: <IA1PR12MB6531B11FBE068CEAF0F23DDCB39FA@IA1PR12MB6531.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> <CAH48Zfwx0eSOEof9V73j+omeyph2=PCV0wRB3fhvnOAAJncr8w@mail.gmail.com> <AjHDOGBqtlmpFAsJ@highwayman.com> <596c41b5-33d0-499b-9f1c-bb1887c5113c@tana.it> <CAH48Zfww_Pvnn_rXemV27hxeX0mcB2=VA3qj4BZBNYrztf_k-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2i3WO3znpVs-HNYwEbqvym9bPr0VH7VNwiCrKi4DEbVusk3g@mail.gmail.com> <IA1PR12MB6531F165E7599E84EC274ED2B37FA@IA1PR12MB6531.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> <6e113046-da9b-40f5-a46e-155903082941@tana.it> <CAL0qLwZAFt77OHLj2Em1K0zuKXjao+LTg7jzSog5WzaNPiOG-A@mail.gmail.com> <067b76f3-6245-44af-b59a-f7aaf59baeb4@tana.it> <CAL0qLwYMFoP-KJkOsNuWzCp2ZYMYrBOeDXZGvfemEf8KbPnUAw@mail.gmail.com> <DBCD6FC7-F059-4C5D-BBF1-46FDFD512849@wordtothewise.com> <CAH48ZfwCCDJm64uiPZNY2DuNhHrC+Q_iUxThW2_aaKq7bXUvqQ@mail.gmail.com> <SJ2PR11MB82973306A3597BEA40FDE497F779A@SJ2PR11MB8297.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <34FC6A7F-9BB0-458C-A1E3-FEC107E1C753@wordtothewise.com> <CAD2i3WOcT3A7c+_3bNNa4pd-yutaTaz-gZwLdE qUX5hmg0Wrww@mail.gmail.com>
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: LQYNABHOICMAZ6QHWVEZZABXS7X6YYSY
X-Message-ID-Hash: LQYNABHOICMAZ6QHWVEZZABXS7X6YYSY
X-MailFrom: johnl@iecc.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dmarc.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: seth@sethblank.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Re: Proposed Recharter to Conclude the ARC Experiment
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance (DMARC)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/OAUhIcLv9g7nIX8AD3MgK32XmyI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dmarc-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dmarc-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dmarc-leave@ietf.org>

It appears that Seth Blank  <seth@sethblank.com> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Let's come back to the charter, please.
>
>To those who chimed in on this thread, it seems to me that most of you are
>OK with the charter as Trent proposed it, due to the resistance to Ale's
>proposed language. Can you please be explicit on if you think Trent's
>proposed charter is adequate for the sake of determining consensus?

It is.

R's from Mumbai,
John

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status