IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Bridging the gap

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 18 June 2022 03:14 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6777C14CF15 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 20:14:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=nra5VC3h; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=rjzmjNO0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N1vg0_GNJO1d for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 20:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 856D3C14CF0E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 20:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 39449 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2022 03:14:07 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=9a16.62ad42ff.k2206; bh=4VHzhe2qLrSvDnLLwLP38Jl34iE6R1G2IgaEx7IRtTQ=; b=nra5VC3hSKompfJwloQvBrlrVj3hmz+AjWeyb6kfPwfb5op7Fn5Mm9FxJDZbqtBwz9fCJfSlr5ZPBUW5g0DiBu+kRV/rF01QS4Us5nGouOWPHv60+MTX+1ebt3lZ+4as0RXMWta0MQxsmZv02AiVRX36GbjUWH0r1RvAtg/G/jlm+WCUF7csRUArAzwUnrvOhEgh3w1f13/jh6ms8g4arLS11H3lEqPMv2cWC9LmNL554zoeYi4Nww2DKnhJNc87slj5JZ3/Bjaa72GZGTlxSD7vQHsXJTPReHENG8UtZb/WNRfVQ1NvZu1wSZU2oGfbBloKPFb17pEHAUDO8vsgZQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=9a16.62ad42ff.k2206; bh=4VHzhe2qLrSvDnLLwLP38Jl34iE6R1G2IgaEx7IRtTQ=; b=rjzmjNO0aL/8LUC9AZCZiFacWLiQ6TsmreyRSCwJ+UTs11U7QMdO0azNrZwowgHkA/shyQOnPs+ZTtTGatPXL0NBdZJXKrcR6oznwP+z60Ig2wnuN2wqoC4Fekiy21TcK1zz+dbc8tauODguUTLMSEfHzhsUH4tC/qFnw8up+sIn/i35Wadr+YOMNK592guInK8sQm5/HZveeC+xWaQV6FUuzA+aUsTWadjUB+Xy0usOACGw4a+kZiF3uNfKZCpi7xFw+mHbMVR5NFilGZg+dj/gby4CmHQD6WUclo6/qqfe9ZKo3usXPZ9lUzIPO3/zkdsw6U7gdjujOtUDzjWTLA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 18 Jun 2022 03:14:07 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5D0AE43BF086; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:14:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF43743BF068; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:14:04 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 23:14:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4d2957fe-b2bd-12fc-1188-4b94c42a3e23@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, dmarc@ietf.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <438cffa8-f18b-fd30-7e05-7ae3347d9470@tana.it>
References: <20220615174742.BBCE443B1333@ary.local> <edde1042-3ac8-6538-816a-411800c709ff@tana.it> <ab19ef53-5cbc-8358-7f9e-a129aa7de716@taugh.com> <438cffa8-f18b-fd30-7e05-7ae3347d9470@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/TaU-Xz9vThbTeknTVaUIlGHqo0M>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Bridging the gap
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 03:14:15 -0000

On Fri, 17 Jun 2022, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> 
>> If you think that's important, why don't you do it?
>
> Is that a mandate?

We'll have to check with the Network Police and see what they say.

As we have discussed ad nauseam, even without adding any PSD tags the tree 
walk will usually give results at least as good as the PSL.  And as we 
have also discussed, for any domain that cares, it's a whole lot easier to 
publish a DMARC record or two than to get an entry in the PSL

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email