IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 18 March 2024 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45235C151532 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="pDn8rJ3s"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="WvS6PNmD"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0zsYQo5wprBz for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F17D3C14CE54 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 71548 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2024 18:53:32 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=1177a65f88dac.k2403; bh=g5T+e+3VONBZClAO7RCN6NcKNWT2277PSmQnVwfe2W4=; b=pDn8rJ3sWG24GbVrS2p21a/aD9NY3JPXTqsYwTBmXUt3woPBxOteAMRomFP0GUks5Fj7+ZSSuPAVTXkH7PHnqdKnPuVVJSsAhad1i1dCKYTr9auTwPVqhN2doNXlZaJ3Nqj9r4ODSwyDJ9iEEvmvDbhx3MbcA+1AdSvDNtLkBKT1MC4MZ7AvDbYTkgHc5iFcz/I+bUvr3lzXF7/cx1LwdtUgMBDOMA9ahLIeccup2ovvfXYx+XWr0+zc9AMApBCvqawao7Onh77arOf4+RwN+dZbo0D9c6h9w+tVQmJtXh5UZeOfar/fDEnUGOkT8nN4UktUPExaams16y13PdlAVQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=1177a65f88dac.k2403; bh=g5T+e+3VONBZClAO7RCN6NcKNWT2277PSmQnVwfe2W4=; b=WvS6PNmDmBNDO5cQZucTFQ88fco7JnfhYOBkBkUuEOyFmo7HwcnZ3K7WcC8XkEtMVjjxKKBuX7s60jbhi3f0P9O4Gem7MW1wSp0Sbxkfn8Bo/myGnPdFEi9QvHud6ttxXE3Y9i3zhqj9g9cLff+tTYhQCrRAkv2US94HuTosFnRIKRhWbmEO5N88Qht3z28NqK9Cf7h759euPclcBT9fG3h3Vn4Vl4jio3WHkcj6NY10d1Zsa9Muusi9wx+UfmSYPEstGEP1DTxj5YXKYyc7asG5ZhQ6+Hykl6MJNiPYfAq/27u0eksOpd1GOdJDPyd/ZJGTKxphNYCaiJbcjKpMCA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 18 Mar 2024 18:53:31 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3AC84859D675; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 14:53:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F22859D654; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 14:53:30 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 14:53:29 -0400
Message-ID: <bb401fec-b3e8-dc56-929c-9aeda594d012@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <40acfc56-8d00-4be1-b3fb-c5f2670b0b88@tana.it>
References: <2068150.yCtiIVWOOC@zini-1880> <20240318013630.455118593233@ary.qy> <CAJ4XoYcoJFqYoAt_jq6jfsSjqtjaifiUzaqY-zkg7R3o5Bio0A@mail.gmail.com> <810a3322-4ba3-ac67-5c7b-0118028aeb34@taugh.com> <CAJ4XoYfCgo6DrD0HLMrL3+xT=K0TebQJdKjsUh3e+d-1ND3uUQ@mail.gmail.com> <40acfc56-8d00-4be1-b3fb-c5f2670b0b88@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/V_mowIW56V1Z7fxQhtWE-G5DOrg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 18:53:40 -0000

On Mon, 18 Mar 2024, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> The text should be terser and clearer, possibly with an example.

I would be happy to remove the whole thing, since it's only distantly 
related to defining or implementing DMARC.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email