Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC Coverage
"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Mon, 15 April 2019 16:52 UTC
Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347D512000F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bt9ifR6ZnHdb for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x12d.google.com (mail-it1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF5151200F5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id s3so13403950itk.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9gHBUJE7zSnRlcdzYLVqummaWITfsy1hu5jJ5QfcZq4=; b=PSs7m2ildhty3WTvSRkKYgOmpSA1Hvk0kospN7KYKDevabdFu3x0s5o4xyNz8riAQw H1E+SCyvYkVb0kPKSgkSXhQIBCRBPj6TiPSAU4gy0QDYPpRv9s9OtNcE9PBCDC5T8gtc pmimeYNyJw8odyc4zPrayJBCs7Eb6Wgsva8jc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9gHBUJE7zSnRlcdzYLVqummaWITfsy1hu5jJ5QfcZq4=; b=L0nHovphsyOUmOA0fTQtT0Gt7uCl07wfgt9wOUOam9EbDKNh0MvGWrrGScQQ+IcUWX tj8SPqi58aYfOqqfXqBTQ5nqhY6ifrQOJcPKFk/TBtSVClaXrcH/HePZ6gYlbQ5Zum40 bBtOMFlaYiSRfSKS7cHKgEE/1OTIAoaf+xHa7iPd6cSX2BrUwL13yh2zr6chz8qDOiAB nsAfW1CDPLt8S0wRLkQFZbZJenvFRh+uv0aRanHI2VzQGof7p/wX4vs7IwBVN6b/ViCP EBgtVHv/yelXToRtESwIDkhJZ52UjkwXWHp2HTBnQmRDjpomiMGqX5a4eD8pQjuM9QM9 wPnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXcD4y/BicHa2oNzd2QT8l/2OGlIk2umYznlsYGoKd7qpF22k46 Qe5u6BtI10d4QmZhJPpqrheIvcASqgVjBSDYpGY3CQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyn9+6U5Tept3ttZnOIFoanU6VE7DIZVFE5fQWdfeqX2lUXCkYgCc+uPWh1zPZC+2oTppwBKbZGefPjNhwx8K8=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:2244:: with SMTP id o65mr24907189ito.126.1555347136952; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8060835.KeXT7UZBJi@kitterma-e6430> <CAJ4XoYdPXGvTxVzbU=LcZyLg+Au2mjV1h61+wXtW3C47fcfMvA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ4XoYdPXGvTxVzbU=LcZyLg+Au2mjV1h61+wXtW3C47fcfMvA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:51:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1or=wO-B6rf1c4LtFm9JJaShn6MjM+EOXB9-GX=-o=TVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Cc: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000099e5d20586947984"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/WHFwj9NzxqlkQ7wXNdpGgQeuXIQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC Coverage
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 16:52:26 -0000
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 6:39 AM Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> wrote: > Scott, it's almost certainly an undercount as there are domains which > validate for DMARC but do not send reports. > Not sure why you would say that since he was looking at "coverage for DMARC feedback". Not necessarily for validation. --Kurt
- [dmarc-ietf] DMARC Coverage Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC Coverage Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC Coverage Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC Coverage Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC Coverage Ian Levy