Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd review

Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com> Wed, 07 August 2019 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@sethblank.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851E3120059 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 14:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id knxP_CyTCW44 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 14:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBD0612003F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 14:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id z23so1817830ote.13 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 14:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4mz32AYgg/tYUJnp+S3QKAT9FJ10hwv14RqBviPg1ug=; b=QN03I9ipOcIRxYwvm+TtJ0TItIPdPm0xpZJEP0oqZn0ad7A4zC9edAqo3InJpgD60T qj2jxdp+WHfeySlGepAeUZXL4iVv+zO66h3SKp1KTawSnhgMM/7WDTmztCNSWj+z/ZZE 8Z87da8YwCC8wiKfx4mwYeVZJPCUJ7I/PfyVt8B1I3LjcPAcczrTyGRmx61NGzEZXkrg LGyMht1oDGcNiSj96XRQs+oOlI7SlkS/8/H0ufZS+m1Y4IsQ1VkilRrvBs3cmPcRFZPO Rioj2svM2oVpWpDcm6Mg7HZQDM9a6e+lWRfx1KXRYymf20J80w+/6r6keDDlGPBPIUA8 E5yQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=4mz32AYgg/tYUJnp+S3QKAT9FJ10hwv14RqBviPg1ug=; b=bqUs7EHsxflIcnzpDi5SMnylojMEzQnfX84DYJ0SEja7Th/cifX5KfarAc1TH04dm0 V7Wi1eKE4Qw78ekuSbiFapvUVS5pfDys/7DvhwudKzyCAUdAMR456eW4KnE/bszhB8PF 9q6hr3c1UC6Zk+QzPdMRLmdtWy+eQ4DxPQYfXOxi5TWXz6Q8I/qsMBqTXycukdOnIvWo +wrGfYFXchQIRKLXUPm/ByVOUZQn0YnuOZ6at0HFm+6d3WmNNkvHqt65NF2Q9wXCPpJg xYyWb3aTh9P0i2uhE4kmBLnauoZ7hRPNxO0Yfedt25No0veSX+Ts6x6Op6eGqsU2DYIV mT8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXyp3kvLIhuxKBuJq794puIqzLkaSel7dT+d++NvrOyr8wKkYiM icIXwYWSKyppryj3Uo1ZKapFJll6dybl/CNk9ya3qKFM
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyY7DYWAcq02GoKkztN0pGIlilWxcR4ozwVCa04rUNxoLTK6O251yAZV6+O4RRuVmuy+SU9c5nXpvBl/El0lDk=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:ea41:: with SMTP id i62mr108988oih.144.1565212528591; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 14:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwaB7K3ro_=d9bfiLTYnAnNTKSQ3g10USmjADQAoYg4bPg@mail.gmail.com> <4195597.6UoUMpgHb9@l5580> <CAL0qLwZvWu1Y+XjSP6jR8LjNZQ4aS1hC-ECe2pv5ptOy-Svg5w@mail.gmail.com> <6247286.Dd9LSJjpfE@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <6247286.Dd9LSJjpfE@l5580>
From: Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 14:15:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD2i3WObUMH3nemQY7WZ0jF=f3fd5qdFwt82XNRvZpO_9fUetw@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c3df23058f8d7009"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/a-_nTBdcL7k2p-gB7PmMPSion8s>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-ietf-dmarc-psd review
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 21:15:32 -0000

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 3:31 PM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> wrote:

> Is silence concurrence?  Comments inline.  Please let me know how to
> proceed
> on updating the draft.   I'd appreciate anyone else's feedback too.
>

Addressing only this point, yes, I concur with all of Murray's comments and
requests.