[dmarc-ietf] General Purpose Domain

Neil Anuskiewicz <neil@marmot-tech.com> Sat, 16 March 2024 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <neil@marmot-tech.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230ABC14F5FF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 13:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=marmot-tech.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X-2SRdHACGcU for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 13:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E710C14F5F9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 13:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1df01161b39so8550075ad.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 13:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marmot-tech.com; s=google1; t=1710619685; x=1711224485; darn=ietf.org; h=to:message-id:subject:date:mime-version:from :content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=GQ1ZdXuTEIUOk4OP9pVLUUllPyW3vBxPHFD8uvj9vy0=; b=MSRhDxnlWfbo+YQTXNKmWDsum5M/SwIZClX/9IAmKbNzodlq0bnpWoqrEApQqcc877 omdVe4CpK3rxIMUi5mdcNd7Ytos6BkyuoBt8Xi3fEqj5SOB7jUfaK9Pn7Blf78w+0MWW W1GqXW5OxmkA6aL9u+VdxA9JhpEa2453ZswrvNO62FMCj0ZMEbdNWV18q+IM+umlcRzo yg+qbwk+wbNfDIpZw6SIzvbjBjWxfM+BUhnB4POTK02nnk5jzYXUO0WijiMm5mZyU2yl 6AqprtF5xGxSa5gFbgOTkQh1BV8pqLgwf+3NzVPhX+6qVKbXWSygD1ONEQFsEpPk+mPq NiNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710619685; x=1711224485; h=to:message-id:subject:date:mime-version:from :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GQ1ZdXuTEIUOk4OP9pVLUUllPyW3vBxPHFD8uvj9vy0=; b=eoz8k23b436He0ymT+9QGMU8imZ24vtQkFMw/3P2JW7qihJaEXxhCw4tsWmwzafiwX 3i09AOgOpkFVSorrUNwy/Z4HadfBPyj+cykuuS6mW5o7KwJMIq/dXFDBtIuJav9fPtTW SNjGRlmvTrZi3+SK7PHCvpQKdFh06PdoNmtD+fuD2snI7ReSlE0cjcim5kkXDc1dOQsZ HYNrGrFVh7t2asbeOdQzMmSha5hjaELVFpXHbtwNCouylMuV105zmXGjHO5X+ykuWIeo oBVhWMx8D8j6clHrZGTJIOKfwUqCbOc6YYSK6Ln7irnrAkWbfatTrr88tALMXbnV9x8P /2jw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwoMeORPmtnoyWGZT4eDzkGh905jkGb3tbO+Fvr9S8TviY14xBK Fss0X/W/nWIRk5/N7gJOcpRjqgFQsrEpsiuD5k/bRsFBpp9UaSMIvd3o2uMAEYIPceFSG9xxcBr Y
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHsH1VEinX0a/woqJ1FJkeBi6TIKbB/kmA70eOZlJGxYPzIV9dh0G4X2E+flUDIe4O0Tll6yQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d504:b0:1dd:2e6:b951 with SMTP id b4-20020a170902d50400b001dd02e6b951mr9585798plg.12.1710619684757; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 13:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-71-236-242-106.hsd1.or.comcast.net. [71.236.242.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u2-20020a170902b28200b001d9edac54b1sm6165109plr.171.2024.03.16.13.08.04 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 16 Mar 2024 13:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Neil Anuskiewicz <neil@marmot-tech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 13:07:53 -0700
Message-Id: <EC7C2036-1E7D-4490-A393-CE11920AB317@marmot-tech.com>
To: IETF WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (21E219)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/bb_ECTS3z4hJ7Qcmt7qb-Mpmegc>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 15:01:34 -0700
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] General Purpose Domain
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:08:10 -0000

Unless I’m misunderstanding, a General Purpose Domain is a separate domain or at least subdomain:

*   You’d use a General Purpose Domain (GPD) exclusively for Mailing Lists
*  You would designate either a subdomain or a less critical org domain as your GPD. 
* The GPD MUST NOT have an enforcing policy of reject. That is, the policy of a GPD must remain p=none.

The heading is Interoperability considerations which is a section mostly talking about indirect mail flows. The explanation’s cursory for such a common and challenging problem. 

I’d say start with defining the problem and solution in more depth, giving Mailing Lists its own heading under Indirect mail flows with a clearly delineated problem and solution even at the risk of some redundancy.

Otherwise, I think there will be a lot of busy people who will miss the indirect mail bit entirely and many who do read it won’t grok what exactly they’re supposed to do and why.

 Neil