IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-akagiri-dmarc-virtual-verification-01.txt

d_kodama@mub.biglobe.ne.jp Tue, 28 February 2017 09:03 UTC

Return-Path: <d_kodama@mub.biglobe.ne.jp>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6303A12947A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 01:03:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6o2DdJOE7nm0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 01:03:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcpt-expgw.biglobe.ne.jp (rcpt-expgw.biglobe.ne.jp [IPv6:2001:260:401:42e::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42777126FDC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 01:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vc-gw.biglobe.ne.jp by rcpt-expgw.biglobe.ne.jp (shby/5611300315) with ESMTP id v1S93gu0005351 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:03:42 +0900
Received: from smtp-gw.biglobe.ne.jp ([172.30.160.83]) by vc-gw.biglobe.ne.jp (shby/0716090908) with ESMTP id v1S93gib000923 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:03:42 +0900
X-Biglobe-Sender: <d_kodama@mub.biglobe.ne.jp>
X-Mailer: BIGLOBE Mail 1.0.0
Received: from bvea33554.zcs.mesh.ad.jp ([172.23.135.32]) by smtp-gw.biglobe.ne.jp id SmcSAC1EA053; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:03:42 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:03:42 +0900
From: d_kodama@mub.biglobe.ne.jp
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Message-ID: <a5e96a85-01f7-4075-aa06-11ab030e8796@bvea33554>
In-Reply-To: <ec9e4371-df18-4348-b834-846aacb47d36@bvea33554>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Biglobe-Spnum: 52339
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/i3hAYAt1QSt9lArUe9xpaTzumO8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-akagiri-dmarc-virtual-verification-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:03:48 -0000

Hi Takehito,

 Thank you for your information. This is good!
 I would like to research my mail servers, too.
 
 Please tell me how to make data more easily.

Daisuke.

> Regarding draft-akagiri-dmarc-virtual-verification-01.txt, I got statistics to show effect of "Virtual DAMRC" in corporation with some Japanese ISPs.
>
>I prepared very simple page for it. Please find it on the URL as bellow.
>https://www.vdmarc.dmarc.jp/?p=122
>
>Any comments will be appreciated.
>
>Best regards,
>--Takehito Akagiri

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email