[dmarc-ietf] Testing with psd=y
Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Tue, 20 December 2022 16:14 UTC
Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1E4C14F72A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:14:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=zx64SwvA; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=PFgZsFSZ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H2eBypeIgvgS for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:14:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B42DC14F728 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:14:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 538DEF8031A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:14:35 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1671552860; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=yxz4Mvd2nTWlbBkpFW151cmMFRp2Gwg7YkccUvPzN64=; b=zx64SwvA2oCtJMdlAgtGi1eUOrdEckmPlKqZ9ZcXSjfJfHkz7JaexE4COVVLmV3gZCbvY EqRhSGEVXVLzB/CAw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1671552860; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=yxz4Mvd2nTWlbBkpFW151cmMFRp2Gwg7YkccUvPzN64=; b=PFgZsFSZ/ld1SHxl32GkE5bKhvAko8JwYclSx8NV76bZ8in3p+yykToO5oyDkRC0HBIQ7 N5aBqvGTLL+OhEzbiDwnCbqXdYY/GsFhbtoDmgzDUWplUDc1p6ozcV9B9V/NVTXEyxjlIVS LfWbEt04PIcHkfEFQtbkrP2wEdrnlF00JlP/Zi5fa4Gxj4ZlDKoK+Iy5nEoQT7bi+iZNkUs xRM5bQIcXZG9yMOHIurudFpOYA96HBpIvLe+QGIEg7nXTN5RC+YPk87i0TUOhgZ6UQEIKjs kiQuEB/X7e2zA4kGIBhmiHnvF/J1YD1sGlefXU5KKzkjvBQlGstFQXiYKCtA==
Received: from zini-1880.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B1EF801DB for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:14:20 -0500 (EST)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:14:15 -0500
Message-ID: <1716100.KuuO1qGGUG@zini-1880>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/kP3r0uJCdHTyh2yzEId1HbHdtRA>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Testing with psd=y
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:14:52 -0000
In case anyone was looking for a live test case, .gov's DMARC record now has the psd= tag. Scott K
- [dmarc-ietf] Testing with psd=y Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Testing with psd=y Scott Kitterman