[dmarc-ietf] nit in section 7.2
Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Tue, 26 January 2021 18:59 UTC
Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516133A0D8E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:59:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.151
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4o_StwCVQUnn for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D4FE3A0D44 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:58:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id jx18so2777560pjb.5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:58:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language; bh=qehqsnVwHThaEWxXUiS5gw4mWhZIzXtwIiVETtABL1c=; b=OsjIUxJX1UzcFnMiiSPZPMLXWCY+dgog3FlQPxWiI7YUu6B3v2JX64hdCqU8rx1Rfo ABHm/YGmC5jjeCgkPacAmhofiCAH0RZwGdKz5S9lmlFFekdgd83eUTeZ3PvJoVT0iugU jW7e5LKQxpjNLGNDc4pAp618v+/T/ikGZVP37jgk80Egkro5UYl1HPVyN39NR/djmqz6 czY12gX1VzH3MCxLMfmqOEV2gPydmBOvPt9bUvf4S/H+k4tzxJ7ox6vvcMrO10s0L5K/ 3/HDQ3Wndx0eXLZT/1shRnUom8zmdGJiMgZeGKZFWcqPVai0NFEB1CfNO7hoCVdcnFtS mXYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-language; bh=qehqsnVwHThaEWxXUiS5gw4mWhZIzXtwIiVETtABL1c=; b=j/zmbhUMRegTGDGJ9CTWRa8yYglbhqa7kdun1bwEmuCtRFJoB6SgmEpXagRBaAXJLM 6/9YZUDAancRhaDvGX0voBS8DC6lUljBE/b0dDR/738cAMZ9+q3GlXIJ7Y9+mE54iHqV eBfncerDRB0D8OGR+bREbqnyDEJGgKhN5L2Z+oZNnHk9JuEYCrGqpCI3usA3dPIuivEd cdytr1sUWmNbeHIHCFY46chPZKfu905PskN7W7HUCpveFvWBuioL3NLI5wUuQsll1HVT 55y6mGtWo5x2hdxJw9bShsHgxaIbR+EOZW8ikbB/t7kntlk/FqA5xY3/av7O15iBvWRV ymBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+btnFe6K3jl6lDJCa66Oez+66cSC5poeT2OjjXzMY/sD7F1xF NEZRHXp52Pp08qfve3E5g/2s6id3asJKFA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFtIcFpqH8Pb+dExPRsEZEFkJOeh+0yqcnHfB0kCJVUJUGcdlwL22tRvdBGzXwGiTC1pq1SA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7207:b029:da:fd0c:521a with SMTP id ba7-20020a1709027207b02900dafd0c521amr7261516plb.45.1611687518671; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:58:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-35-22.volcanocom.com. [107.182.35.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i4sm11256028pfo.40.2021.01.26.10.58.37 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:58:38 -0800 (PST)
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <71342cc2-9f87-89e4-42f1-1d617ee71f80@mtcc.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:58:36 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------7524E8103D99ABF82109734C"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/lItL3BGKk3ZFlwMSXhDqK9UnUnQ>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] nit in section 7.2
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:59:11 -0000
"The report SHOULD include the following data:" Normative SHOULD here since very strange because what follows is informational, and why would it be SHOULD in the first place? It seems to me it ought to be: "The report includes the following data:" If there are normative requirements, it seems like it would be better to put it into the XML section itself. Mike
- [dmarc-ietf] nit in section 7.2 Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] nit in section 7.2 Alessandro Vesely