IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #111 - MX/A/AAAA test needs justification

Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com> Fri, 07 May 2021 01:52 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702783A0846 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 18:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.683
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.683 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LSUlZp0gI4hA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2021 18:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D3313A0840 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 May 2021 18:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com with SMTP id s15so1115816vsi.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 May 2021 18:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JuJjU74gdG+JjXjwsbvtBGts+yvbA/s9cDpAJJFVdNY=; b=fUzCcNRh2qP08Maouw7K5wddSZcrFWuMU39h3tdvMTus5IMYca6759M02ENSrXLSwX YR5IFNd1qu7BdCePpHJOXPo8OWbIu7q0x2fmxb65r8SDwxRVJEb7N9SpEN3FuJYFoP8r XTwBiMOlKkTS/TBLeSlSwj3h2mzrHEGRbyaRDUxU5CVRyAPQkoNjqAWdAF8g+YQOo8Jv /2jl4PjXkZL0pcdh1sRgtGLl4RIrApbCI334mySqTkpSa5yJrkRZc9MFDpkPY1wtRA/8 x+8XsEyrzPU4A9DopYykamBgC5vhTRk6ZWRVP2BY2+GlkQ0vRtTt3JwsuixK2MzfVAdT ReMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=JuJjU74gdG+JjXjwsbvtBGts+yvbA/s9cDpAJJFVdNY=; b=LS/1wHkyRB7wu1ba76HCq4LHXsrkgI2NZkCRSut3E/fu7gE5pFNqd5YunftYHjz6BP eNusn/do4M7mrbrfoTLejYJkDEwE9HhYzFN4Pb/DHECE+SsEj9U8a+fzApz4XcDOxF33 +pfyEeUe7dnk9eTPJp3wW/vlHrQyZYv7Gs1wa7sZqD/4V1akPBpq5e9Ulwl2zdcERhaE cAa+tGOB+3UN3UVhu8wlR3alC8EQTGXiWbeoAW5GGp+14KjjBnsuBDdPAQ5eeQG0eb4b RP44UyxUaD7mVYdZh23rT8WbIRqu1q56ZTXmUs3zPZcGOOsQ1NmTxxRxfiD/C/De5Blk OMVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Jvz+xJYAsZstSno1culd6Fh7yZSGJQN7GdAeR/FVyI7jvRm6i Z3EBkbsudjuHZ6v+ugb1VeV1og9x5fVnAYpDbRtb37nmXBU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRsvvae996LEibpl9dLkAOtFZt94b9S2RhdeeUhPX3gDC37NNznCP/57d7uizLgLYR28J3QC+YWa+FtSyMotw=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:b341:: with SMTP id b1mr6750342vsm.41.1620352360684; Thu, 06 May 2021 18:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH48Zfz67fFkyPMhvcQ6JHJLSwH9UAtENrDrzDC=1p-CHJ9oPg@mail.gmail.com> <20210507014508.78064719D42@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20210507014508.78064719D42@ary.qy>
From: Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 18:52:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOZAAfMA4t_prVSKHLq_oifoTh=dLWs9uOjxeMsysZQQ7gqvvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000deb87005c1b3aecc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/mALA_TTytCi74r1LEn11481_ko4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #111 - MX/A/AAAA test needs justification
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 01:52:48 -0000

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 18:47 John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> It appears that Douglas Foster  <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
> said:
> >My perception has been that NDRs are widely ignored even when they are
> >sent.  Is your experience different?
>
> Yes.  We are not going to rewrite RFC 5321 here.  Please stop.


Doug, I don’t understand what textual consideration within the DMARCbis
documents you are discussing.

Please reference the text in question and your proposed modifications, or
move on to a topic which is material to driving this bis documents to
completion, which is our current work item.

Seth, as Chair
-- 

*Seth Blank* | VP, Product
*e:* seth@valimail.com
*p:* 415.273.8818

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email