[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: WG Review: Mail Maintenance (mailmaint)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 19 April 2024 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5EBC14F6A1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BLB7yi6MIhNG for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236B6C14F696 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-57051f9ade8so612169a12.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713548085; x=1714152885; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OQAXBtwLRelA/+d44g2nJW9mYJs6l68kd0XQj/zvT+A=; b=g7HVFC7pPe/07eplSJOs6yrUHYlQndTFcIWPFiQu86MklbAPqjfi8xihFJU32g9UFv p73Hioj51RPQ8dhtPTiKU2zFuRREf+afH8KgVs18kZUoG847u2gg1WPKql8mkp0FYB1m NsxiJULD/QUsMtEBycQvwb3TAUjKeG0R2e2dcG2usGM1FWc/59XwE7ZNEBxkNsuXM7Gg pr5DES8as4jhPNZQcDdfMcnufcPqCPfCFQNxo74BZIVGXg7xyFYqfpWCZqc2XTQ8Yovc lJbplkbx7isOTvEnbfCVHCi+7MldYTEtL9LXRTSHrvH6tY1HzzdTDUKFPBrgx2lioAW8 f9jA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713548085; x=1714152885; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OQAXBtwLRelA/+d44g2nJW9mYJs6l68kd0XQj/zvT+A=; b=UMXvm+eT0wmuZCzKboUu71+2GqY5voij+0ECl/J5hqxCt2j3ef7OzavsBwJRzrkw1J g5UCjPftYydrO3mdA2oeAR6n+OvXxJX/2zPpaN7teoFb3GwLtP2VvbekcMqNf5PsAW3T F7XHd7jf/3OkM/Q175UOgdONkatWnUX+zi4exFlcSSUyO6Hf+oGGtQC/LXpIar/FNYcY ojwUS/52gYGZQSc4BcsiosJvuoeaw6oDXLWwddC1Rc4Y82cuZENZa9vHhXy6dkQrKwUa i2VAhr8vvLaKk5t86nRBL02rMYTsQFTfmfMcgQEdI98GFa1PQKobD7HJFxNTZZu/uUyI NzKg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzc47SL/qteN8EF650ggYEXqgy5ShjG6AGpf75Do0AAX717/PSY upJ9bV8X9chBSyKXxIiySd4A4a0wL26SQfvBzr4SKRGu7wqrvSf7WCS+Cx1WWa6XvtHFvgX88gi jycgw9vhyJDigzPUvgpYbqUB2w6f3NA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHKqM3/buWavKoPffnuNqSWY8sSR2WM/Sqh/GaYLM1f0CYhsFGDX1ebjUhvReYuOmOTSbLScAaEMPtmckHFiQ4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2088:b0:a52:54f2:6ae6 with SMTP id pv8-20020a170907208800b00a5254f26ae6mr1878770ejb.1.1713548084761; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <171354751915.42440.9058103568713803636@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <171354751915.42440.9058103568713803636@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:34:32 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaTNgpB9__xXYHQAqrj0uhYsoLq1yvPV7Vb8JxfQE7T=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e5dea606167680c4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/v9sLCVXj1GBU_J3XKLzG5f5Cdpc>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: WG Review: Mail Maintenance (mailmaint)
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:34:52 -0000

FYI only.  Please don't discuss this here; send feedback to me directly or
to iesg@ietf.org.

-MSK, ART AD

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:25 AM
Subject: WG Review: Mail Maintenance (mailmaint)
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>


A new IETF WG has been proposed in the Applications and Real-Time Area. The
IESG has not made any determination yet. The following draft charter was
submitted, and is provided for informational purposes only. Please send your
comments to the IESG mailing list (iesg@ietf.org) by 2024-04-29.

Mail Maintenance (mailmaint)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Current status: Proposed WG

Chairs:
  TBD

Assigned Area Director:
  Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>

Applications and Real-Time Area Directors:
  Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
  Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>

Mailing list:
  TBD

Group page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/mailmaint/

Charter: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-mailmaint/

Internet Messaging (“email”) is one of the oldest applications still
supported by the IETF.  It consists of numerous layers and extensions that
support the robust construction, transport, retrieval, and interpretation of
messages.

(For the purposes of this charter, “email” starts in RFC 5321 which covers
transport and RFC 5322 which covers message format, and extends into
specifications based on those documents and their antecedents.  It does not
include extensions to related protocols such as IMAP.)

>From time to time, new work in the email space is brought to the IETF for
consideration and development.  Where there is enough critical mass to
create
a working group to develop and publish the work, this is the preferred
case.
More often, however, a proposal is brought that lacks enough critical mass
to
independently support chartering of a working group, but would still be
useful to publish as a standard.  Such projects must then either seek the
assent of an Area Director willing to sponsor it as a standards track
document, or support via the Independent Stream Editor (ISE) without
standards track status.

The MAILMAINT (“Mail Maintenance”) working group will consider projects in
the email space that are too small to warrant construction of a dedicated
working group.  This will take advantage of a common community to consider
these proposals rather than forming a series of disparate but related
communities.

Work proposed for MAILMAINT may arrive via direct proposals, or it may be
referred via one or more DISPATCH-style working groups.  Calls for Adoption
are required for all work proposals.

Proponents of work that is not taken up within the IETF may, of course,
decide to bring their proposal to the Independent Stream.  The working group
should discuss such proposals with the ISE and share the results of the
working group’s consideration.

Further, MAILMAINT will observe the following constraints when considering
the adoption of new work directly:

* Prior to accepting any Standards Track document for development, there
must
be a commitment to implement the resulting proposed standard from at least
two independent parties, as recorded on a related IETF mailing list.  An
interoperability demonstration will be preferred.

* When deciding to send any Standards Track work to the IESG, there must
first be produced a report documenting at least two (preferably more)
independent implementations with at least partial interoperation based on
the
developed specification.

* Chartering of a dedicated working group with a custom charter is strongly
preferred when engaging any work that updates the base email documents (RFC
5321 and RFC 5322 and their successors).

All work will be announced to appropriate non-WG lists such as ietf-822,
ietf-smtp, ietf-dkim, etc., at the time a Call For Adoption or Working Group
Last Call begins.

Standards work being taken up by MAILMAINT should be checked with other
relevant areas (mainly Security) to confirm appropriate oversight or
possible
assignment to that area.

Milestones will be used to track all approved work, including during
chartering and rechartering.

Milestones:

  Jul 2024 - Call For Adoption of draft-dweekly-wrong-recipient



_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce