IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Is there any recommendation to send DMARC message-specific failure reports FROM:<> ?

Juri Haberland <juri@sapienti-sat.org> Sun, 26 May 2019 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <juri@sapienti-sat.org>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E041200A1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2019 14:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sapienti-sat.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75xAKNxwV2e1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 May 2019 14:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from batleth.sapienti-sat.org (batleth.sapienti-sat.org [IPv6:2a01:4f8:221:43c5::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5E91120131 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2019 14:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sapienti-sat.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:date :message-id:from:from:references:to:subject:subject; s= dkim20170413; t=1558906017; bh=nFETcuSxLtLKPtHue91u/o9gn1sNfsb4p ojclShdNqg=; b=wGzaFXSVyOR5jEKe7pS9uwgI3EPvZz/qmGHBawVcb7ZruG6hG NqI4pCMfFZu5v9Bgoqee3gOmoV4r1cE3hK4L9y7k9BaHNLii/Ai7qxdvcrDTJ3ua 5yIxG/UyyLf0mb1Go8/vzs2oL+C6tdp2XS1Z8Vqe8D2ODGHjh8nhaS053H0BJ5eI DW6koFpBVpG6bi3/EPx9mnAO8WTemyaDVtTz+bjvFr6fO1sMVC+N0dkWXAjaPZEr iypfxOKZQOYmvBMXdqtQ3hrhYCYKNiDBFGZlrUf+azxWo2r1FhPIng/6VPvCG1Ch SPZfPGNsZm1QBY73Ux4P6AUQ0LWIM36ImPG6g==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at sapienti-sat.org
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:6d:e38::100] (boot0.home.sapienti-sat.org [IPv6:2001:470:6d:e38::100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: juri@sapienti-sat.org) by batleth.sapienti-sat.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2344133E00D5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 May 2019 23:26:57 +0200 (CEST)
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20190525215318.1580620149E52F@ary.qy>
From: Juri Haberland <juri@sapienti-sat.org>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=juri@sapienti-sat.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQGiBEpkkU0RBACvs80AZxmG2dlbE8uFuRtWaGbvdlTKzwn4s37Sc98yNzDr57btydCdasf8 OvctyUrngCuC/JmBDw9MpNVVRJ2lLOSi7r5JgjXSbpeW95UKUnQk2m/+nRkNPrKY0FXhP4VE 04lmV3vb0cKpi3Iuceuc4U/PkwlbfzvMCqMJp/zGGwCgqnxsnNu+MOEPB1zum0pT1ZmZptEE AJkzjTYdnt4zarO0K8Yk9BMy39puGMuW6HD4MiN1DfkqH9RYe7qh6L8DasmSed/TlVNpsH+y fdhwD/9f+8Ifc1vpFjgcm9mEmJqyjpQTKG9oQE1KpcnHXKwG/Gr/lXrQbgiiungc+d18tafN yAKQfmkKIDqFVmKPjlOJHWYN7qlKA/0R3/6RyerO84hsLt6jFWeOm/9KEh6WfnoooDQhAq7M sFjCNUoF32x/hpabB9MqF6vcl/Ka8Dmdj95Ae10K9MD5L7TNaWkL7FepFptcCkHonLQQM4E2 vDAJtyyKUaQiOPw80oEOMISXzQD78Vbg6Q9nmsmkpuSAUVTqUksTTwtnNrQmSnVyaSBIYWJl cmxhbmQgPGp1cmlAc2FwaWVudGktc2F0Lm9yZz6IYAQTEQIAIAUCSmSRTQIbAwYLCQgHAwIE FQIIAwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJED9MVq+NNYZCRlAAn38ddF0pjwOZR0VyoIe4UpfpZV5fAKCO o87TVyYoBYwru4hunuVMOpXgG7kCDQRKZJFTEAgAoBRVOPPgl3foNLJn+C8QnuExrwKdeguE 5l2lSw3Fummo9CQCN72gYrqMNksFeIcoWAWclm/8bA551KWum8g2TjTA7NuVdIvzahr8MFGi oBNktr1GLAJ2SNpzyUA3fICIJqXdUdlvnjk4olQE6ACylbxDT+2x5HVzvhxw1fvz4c4JRvnP J1q2/LMu6sgBta6cgVTzYzBvxf1JyjbHsFKZSJZ+3JO3AO5y40XbU+EZVT60ChbU8GCJEVer 2RFlYfYSdniSxgQPuYVxZsfXgQlv0xQ3QTTDLU9jpJJX4EfwfWaio01X3l8QqIBtVpu07ZXI klOJk1QXC3HDIhAt/uGdVwAEDQgAmK0fEhrg/HY2Zs2VXIkWViS8I68sAw/GRGAsif0pkHTx dQ2oEZYMK1bNW7VFBphby554hUAmvwcCCUso0INqiw0sXs6ZARL3nT6QPc3uU0jMFpg1cWHf yElUopAR0S0kxVfShE3fNKOnizTPcRboCLOVZzuM1BxVO55Dkc9fPX1zik9hzJjbG4bzEqNG cg7+EY0YqeEVFccyRXsjvFRTl4ckvCMhsyqGwE8AnwFOYJXqfbLjEDSBngblniWTEjZ47t5p rN6sri7+sWIUaybzdINKGZMijndTVccMtRvbbx62+0dRoxUV2GIrNcCOvQ7e5Q4/vL8okoK9 MZMUWQnUeYhJBBgRAgAJBQJKZJFTAhsMAAoJED9MVq+NNYZCX74An2lQsova+seE0su7vK2y GGyRrnQdAJ9nvrSrslx2qcHkRycgYoFozVkRsw==
Message-ID: <30e0f076-cd4e-ee88-6a7f-8923c4978963@sapienti-sat.org>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 23:26:56 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190525215318.1580620149E52F@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/vSmRyAE4oSaksE0x1VJaMkxoWow>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Is there any recommendation to send DMARC message-specific failure reports FROM:<> ?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 21:27:02 -0000

On 25/05/2019 23:53, John Levine wrote:

> We've had failure reports for almost seven years and I don't ever
> recall someone getting into a mail loop so it's not a problem in
> practice.

I had at least two or three mail loops caused by failure reports sent to
some small sites (as my is) and that was the reason for me to stop sending
failure reports.


Just my 2 cents,
  Juri

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email