[DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's No Record on draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-04: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 11 April 2017 13:45 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0E9129BF6; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 06:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params@ietf.org, Dapeng Liu <max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com>, dmm-chairs@ietf.org, max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com, dmm@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.49.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149191832473.15766.16303254136555834233.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 06:45:24 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/1h7rPaEFkhebCsWRX6tuqgb9ALE>
Subject: [DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's No Record on draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:45:26 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-04: No Record When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Minor comments: 1) Please add a reference to rfc5213 right at the beginning of the intro: s/A large Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) deployment/A large Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) [RFC5213] deployment/ 2) Section 3.1 says: "The alignment of the sub-option MUST be 4n." Is that actually (still) important? Is this also the reason for the reserved field in the option or is there an expectation that any flags will be needed in future? Could you remove the reserved field and require 6n then (given you anyway at least need the LCMP Type and Length fields)? No strong need to change anything, just asking... 3) Given that section 4 only has one subsection, I guess the subsection heading for 4.1 can simply be removed. 4) Are sections 4 and 5 updates to RFC5213? I find the use of normative language at the beginning of each section a little weird, e.g.: "The LMA MUST allow the following variables to be configured by the system management." Isn't it implicit that these things have to be configurable to implement this option? I would just not use normative language here... 5) Also section 4: I would recommend to use normative language rather to define the used values itself than what they should be configured to, e.g. OLD "It SHOULD NOT be set to less than 30 seconds or more than 3600 seconds." NEW "The delay time SHOULD NOT be less than 30 seconds or more than 3600 seconds." Maybe even use a MUST here? 6) Security consideration: Aren't there security implications if an external node can influence the number of message and therefore the network load?
- [DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's No Record on draft-ietf-d… Mirja Kühlewind