Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Fri, 23 March 2018 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7039124E15 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 01:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWRqTtxgvUGt for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 01:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6BEE12E890 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 01:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1015; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1521793587; x=1523003187; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=atpfZNwnMVJuwAScg+JG1mcA2uKWqnLraHZSfuftFh8=; b=GWjGSJW7K9bF+E2HtWi0Q054HrVloGYw5sBWmXmHgsp54B+jz380hRLt u2sMdYfFK0mkG4pbj1HBMbAKn8THg31SBRAibE2UlX3imSCV3WtmA9w9m aOmi0qZ+RGkUuMjwWEsDceqCdzy0DVrzvUdLG5a2xcM+XLVkTJCTORId1 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AOAQBnubRa/5FdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM9YXAoCotRjQ+Bc4ERkkmBLgNVCyWEYAKDZCE0GAECAQEBAQEBAmsohSYBBAE6PxACAQgOKAULMiUCBA4FhQYID6sDiECCFQWFL4IRgVRAhBKDEwEBA4cwA5c5CAKFT4hejDeJD4Y8AhETAYEkARw4M4EfcBWCfYIhGBKOBG8Bjz6BFgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,349,1517875200"; d="scan'208";a="371532975"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Mar 2018 08:26:26 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (xch-aln-006.cisco.com [173.36.7.16]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w2N8QQiu018673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:26:26 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) by XCH-ALN-006.cisco.com (173.36.7.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:26:26 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:26:25 -0500
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
CC: Distributed Mobility Management Discussion List <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"
Thread-Index: AQHTwoCi0vwnOQ244E+VwnjUwd3aMw==
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:26:25 +0000
Message-ID: <D6DA07BB.2AE543%sgundave@cisco.com>
References: <151614272808.15844.15510087701780536192.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D69A2338.2A3B74%sgundave@cisco.com> <CAAedzxqQt-8_ej_y8STq22hwMJuTZutyhdEQ-A=XXqCFdVbyVA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxqQt-8_ej_y8STq22hwMJuTZutyhdEQ-A=XXqCFdVbyVA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.7.170905
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.20.188.60]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B5CE3DB63473A4439108B16FF316685E@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/1lTZPLyJTQ4lA878NDZlGs1aDeE>
Subject: Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:26:35 -0000

Yes, in the LS response that we sent to 3GPP on 2/16, we did cite the
below work. 


----
There are many proposals on this including:

https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-feng-dmm-ra-prefixtype-01.txt
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility-08.txt

Also, some proposals from the previous years, which may be related:

https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-ndp-support-03.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-id-02.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bhandari-dhc-class-based-prefix-05.tx
t
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kaiser-nd-pd-01

...



Sri




On 3/22/18, 6:10 PM, "Erik Kline" <ek@google.com> wrote:

>> Also, some proposals from the previous years, which may be related:
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-ndp-support-03.txt
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-id-02.txt
>
>There's also the existing PvD work in int-area.
>
>I think PvDs may work well for this...