IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] Review request for the Home Network Prefix Renumbering inPMIPv6

" Z.W. Yan " <yan@cnnic.cn> Mon, 21 September 2015 08:33 UTC

Return-Path: <yan@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63ACE1A8A44 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hOXY724Wudoa for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE381A8A3A for <dmm@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 01:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Foxmail (unknown [218.241.111.47]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0AZIDjCwP9VXAR2AA--.7102S2; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:33:06 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:33:06 +0800
From: "Z.W. Yan" <yan@cnnic.cn>
To: 金子直樹 <naoki8kaneko@gmail.com>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
References: <20150918153032241295126@163.com>, <CA+Cqj46kwy65qMNsZxUDJN-Fq9TRsumA9f4KaP7nSb_y8_m-iA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <201509211633059842997@cnnic.cn>
X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 22 [cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====003_Dragon580848177545_====="
X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0AZIDjCwP9VXAR2AA--.7102S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7Zw43ZF43Gr47Zw48tr13urg_yoW8XrW3pF W3Krn5GrWkG34UG3yrC3WrJFyY9FyYq3y2gasxtw1jyFW5uFyvgr1vkr4Yq3Wavr1ftan0 qr47urn8JF9rZrJanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9Gb7Iv0xC_Cr1lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Xr0_Ar1l84ACjcxK6xII jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4 A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG6xAIxVCF xsxG0wAqx4xG6I80eVA0xI0YY7vIx2IE14AGzxvEb7x7McIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r 18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vI r41lFcxC0VAYjxAxZF0Ew4CEw7xC0wCY02Avz4vE14v_GFyl42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I 8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUGVWUWwC20s026x8GjcxK67AK xVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1Y6r17MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcV AFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8I cIk0rVWrZr1j6s0DMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI 0_Jr0_GrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU8BBT5UUUUU==
X-CM-SenderInfo: x1dqqupqqluhdfq/
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/6qwrKpPO1j6sSmogcniun9d6bto>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Review request for the Home Network Prefix Renumbering inPMIPv6
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:33:19 -0000

Glad to get your comments, we will polish the expression in the next version.


2015-09-21 



Z.W. Yan 



发件人： 金子直樹 
发送时间： 2015-09-21  16:21:42 
收件人： dmm 
抄送： 
主题： Re: [DMM] Review request for the Home Network Prefix Renumbering inPMIPv6 
 
Dear all,


I have reviewed the draft carefully. The solution makes sense, but the express should be polished further.
For example, some abbreviation are given their full name, while some are not (DHCP, RA, etc.). Please check it.


Best regards,
N. Kaneko


2015-09-18 16:30 GMT+09:00 bohaofeng@163.com <bohaofeng@163.com>:

Hi, all,


I have read the draft carefully and found it useful. HNP renumbering is necessary in many scenarios. One problem in the draft is the citation of RFC documents, e.g. sometimes [RFCXXXX], sometimes RFCXXXX. Please unify them.

Regards,


Bohao 
Hi all
Kindly consider to review the draft "Home Network Prefix Renumbering in PMIPv6": https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum/ Before the WG adoption call, authors are willing to get further comments and improve the draft.
J. 
--
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University
#email: jonghyouk@gmail.com
#webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon



bohaofeng@163.com 

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email